共用方式為

Doing What You Want, Not What You Have To!

  • 發行項

Birm here.....

As I go about my daily routine, I talk a lot with people directly involved in software design and development. It’s become clear that based on their training and experience, each person has a different take on what constitutes “user experience.” And while they have an idea of usability, they’re not well schooled in how usability is achieved.

Usability – good usability -- is a concept which is at the very heart of a great user experience. That being the case, and given that we’re just getting started with our blogging on user experience, it seems the right thing to do to step back a moment and agree on its definition. I’ll try not to be too tedious as we go about this…but we’re laying a foundation here, and it’s important that we all really understand usability in the same way.

The International Standards Organization (ISO) published back in the early 90’s a standard having to do with the ergonomics of first visual display terminals (remember them?). ISO 9241 has evolved from discussing simple VDT’s to present-day computers. It now includes standards for the usability of software. To be specific (pun intended), ISO 9241-11 says that usability is “the extent to which a product can be used by specified users to achieve specified goals with effectiveness, efficiency, and satisfaction in a specified context of use.”

They expand on this in another part of the standard. Notice the three words I italicized in that paragraph. “Efficiency” refers to the accuracy and completeness with which a user achieves their goals. “Effectiveness” has to do with how much effort the user has to do so. Finally, “satisfaction” is about how happy a user is with the tools they have to employ to get to their goals. In each case, it’s all about how well everyday people are able to interact with the products you design and build.

The Usability Professionals Association (UPA) – a group of which I am proud to be a member– says usability is, “an approach to product development that incorporate direct user feedback throughout the development cycle in order to reduce costs and create products and tools that meet user needs.” Here we see a point of view of people who are trying to get across to business decision makers the value of incorporating validated usability into their products. Turns out that the argument is actually a fairly easy one to make. There is a demonstrable ROI to usability, and we’ll be talking about that in a later blog.

Back around the turn of the century, Steve Krug wrote a really great book called Don’t Make Me Think. His definition gives a more personal perspective to the concept. Krug says, “Usability really just means making sure that something works well: that a person of average (or even below average) ability and experience can use the thing – whether it’s a web site, a fighter jet, or a revolving door—for its intended purpose without getting hopelessly frustrated.” Not a lot of us have flown fighter jets. But I’ll bet that more than once you’ve pushed on a door that the builder expected folks to pull open instead.

I’ve saved the best definition for last. In his book, User Centered Web Design, John Cato defines usability as “…being able to do the things you want to, not the things you have to.” And that friends, is what usability is all about. If with our applications, our customers get to do what they want how they want to do it, then they’ll have a great user experience.

It's just as simple -- and just as complicated -- as that.

Comments