通过

Building ASP.NET 2.0 Web Sites Using Web Standards

  • 项目

This article was written awhile ago but got stuck in our MSDN Editorial queue (with about 10 other articles still sadly) but they are coming out -- if you are interested in Standards based design this article does a great job of explaining how things in ASP.NET 2.0 work and how to build those sites to be standards based.

Check it out here at: https://msdn.microsoft.com/asp.net/default.aspx?pull=/library/en-us/dnaspp/html/aspnetusstan.asp

Comments

  • Anonymous
    August 31, 2005
    You have no idea how sweet this is. All uppercase tags and stuff in 1.1 drove me batty This was long overdue. Compliant html would have been nice but compliant xhtml with validation tools to boot you can't beat this.
  • Anonymous
    September 01, 2005
    +1 to Jeff's comments. Two steps forward for standards compliance!!!

    My only issue now is related to the 2.0 controls. with Beta2 when they render, they only rendered in thier own table. A very frustrating thing to have pop up on the end user's browser when one has gone to all the trouble to use CSS-P to layout a page. Dropping a bunch of tables on the screen with no summery attribute. Guess that counts as one step back.

    I'm currently setting up my Virtual PC so I can try the August CTP. Hopefully I'll see div's or spans instead of tables.
  • Anonymous
    September 02, 2005
    Well loaded up August CTP on my virtual pc. I installed the personal web starter kit, setup admin, launched it and viewed source.

    Sadly, the site navigation control is still table based. In fact the code output for the personal web site's nav control consists of 7 tables. Seven tables to display 4 items, and no means in the UI to attach a summary. and that's with the dtd set to xhtml 1.1 strict.

    I hate the idea that I might have to write my own controls, because VWD is soooo close to being being the only tool I need.
  • Anonymous
    September 30, 2005
    A great article. I forwarded this one on to my staff.
  • Anonymous
    June 23, 2006
    The comment has been removed