VB.NET 9.0: Object and Array Initializers
Last week I was exploring VB.NET for the ISV demo delivery. Some findings I want to share with you. First the object and Array Initializers
Let’s suppose we have a class called Customer
Public Class Customer
Public Id As Integer
Public Name As String
End Class
Now when you initialize this object in conventional VB.NET, this could be your approach,
Dim cust As New Customer()
With cust
.Id = 1
.Name = "VB.NET"
End With
Now in VB.NET 9.0 we do things in little differently,
Dim cust = New Customer() With {.Id = 2, .Name = "VB.NET 9.0"}
Also for array initialization in VB.NET we go for,
Dim objCusts(1) As Customer
objCusts(0) = New Customer() With {.Id = 3, .Name = "VB.NET 10.0"}
objCusts(1) = New Customer() With {.Id = 4, .Name = "VB.NET 11.0"}
In VB.NET 9.0 we write,
Dim objCusts() As Customer = { _
New Customer() With {.Id = 3, .Name = "VB.NET 10.0"}, _
New Customer() With {.Id = 4, .Name = "VB.NET 11.0"}}
It is small (to me simple), it is sweet.
Namoskar!!!
Comments
Anonymous
February 05, 2008
Last week I was exploring VB.NET for the ISV demo delivery. Some findings I want to share with you. FirstAnonymous
June 22, 2009
can we edit name value of objCusts(0)Anonymous
September 14, 2010
Is it possible to initialize Lists which are members of the class using this method?Anonymous
September 27, 2010
@LVS, yes you can initialize a List of custom classAnonymous
December 23, 2010
c#
new List<String>() {"Value1", "Value2", "Value3"} Vb
New List(Of String) From { "Value1", "Value2", "Value3" }
Anonymous
July 31, 2013
THANKSAnonymous
April 24, 2014
the more things you add to the langage the more ugly it's become. Its not small and it is more complexe. Now you have 2 new statements and a double arrays in array that you use in a constructor with the "With" key word. And if we have an array of 1000 customers ?