Udostępnij za pośrednictwem

Configuration Manager 2012 SP1 and App-V 5.0 Integration – More Than Meets the Eye

  • Artykuł

This post has moved here

Comments

  • Anonymous
    January 01, 2003
    Hi Anis, this is definitely possible, use the streaming methodology to deliver your packages with CM.
  • Anonymous
    January 01, 2003
    Hi Erik, that's right, group policy can be used to override this, however with SP2 we have also added a registry key which allows you to ignore the location provider.
  • Anonymous
    February 10, 2014
    Hi Thamim, Excellent post. But I'm a little bit confused on how can I still use SCS mode while delivering with CM ? I want to store my packages on a central location for my XenApp clients and use CM to publish packages to XenApp servers. is this possible ?
  • Anonymous
    February 12, 2014
    Hi, as the locationprovider for app-v integration can be set by policy, will this still overrule default SCCM 2012 client behaviour ? We are planning to use full infrastructure App-V 5 and SCCM 2012 R2 for our new Fusion-IO based VDI solution (XenApp7/MCS on Hyper-V). SCCM implementation is nearing completion in our testenvironment, but it's too early to start testing myself.
  • Anonymous
    February 12, 2014
    I would like to add to that, the following question : is it possible to use sccm 2012 R2 / app-v v4.6 SP2 integration, together with App-V 5 in full infrastructure setup ? That would be a nice transitional setup for us.
  • Anonymous
    May 29, 2014
    Hi, has anyone gotten the IgnoreLocationProvider registry key to work. If set this 1 (using app-v 5 sp2 hf4 client), add a publishing server, this publishing server still gets removed by sccm.

    As Erik asked above is there any way to use SCCM 2012 R2 but allow the app-v client on VDI desktops to use a full infrastructure server for app-v and not be sccm integrated?