Udostępnij za pośrednictwem

Why hasn't Larry posted in almost a month?

  • Artykuł

Mostly because Larry's been swamped with work :).

 

I've been heads down working on stuff and it's pretty much monopolized my time for the past month or so.  The good news is that my schedule has relaxed a bit (although I still have what seems to be a never ending stream of threat models to review).

Comments

  • Anonymous
    February 15, 2008
    PingBack from http://www.biosensorab.org/2008/02/15/why-hasnt-larry-posted-in-almost-a-month/

  • Anonymous
    February 16, 2008
    Heheh, excellent, good to have you blogging again, I always enjoy your posts. Swamped with Windows 7 related work, Larry? Or is that confidential? :-)

  • Anonymous
    February 16, 2008
    I'm working on "stuff" :).  Since my posts often reflect what I'm working on day-to-day, you might be able to figure it out from what I'm posting on, but not always - for instance, the QI post from the other day had nothing to do with my day-to-day work :). Neither will Monday's post (which is a followup to the QI post).  But others might.

  • Anonymous
    February 23, 2008
    I expect you were busy helping to prepare the documentation on the windows protocols just released. http://msdn2.microsoft.com/en-us/library/cc216514.aspx Since you said you were involved with the last release: http://blogs.msdn.com/larryosterman/archive/2006/07/25/678213.aspx

  • Anonymous
    February 23, 2008
    Actually I had very little to do with that effort.  I worked on: MS-RAP (the remote admin protocol), MS-BRWS (the Windows browser protocol) and MS-DPL4 (the DirectPlay4 protocol).

  • Anonymous
    February 25, 2008
    The comment has been removed

  • Anonymous
    February 26, 2008
    PatriotB: We documented every protocol that had to deal with a Windows client talking to a Windows server over a network. Another example I was associated with was the MS-RAP protocol.  It's the remote admin protocol used by Lan Manager and Windows 98 clients.  And we had to document a large subset of the protocol because Windows 98 clients used it. Check the documentation out - it's massive.