Udostępnij za pośrednictwem


Exchange Server 2013 Reaches General Availability and Ex2010 SP3 in Q1-2013

Hello everyone,

 

Back in October, we announced that the Release to Manufacturing (RTM) build of Exchange Server 2013 was signed off.

Since that time, we’ve been focusing our efforts on releasing the next version of Exchange through multiple distribution channels to our business customers.

 

Today, we’ve reached another important milestone – The Exchange team is excited to announce the general availability of Exchange Server 2013. You can download the bits from TechNet today and evaluate the product for 180 days. You can also sign up for the Office 365 Previewto get the most current Exchange experience in the cloud in just a few minutes.

 

For those of you who wish to roll out Exchange Server 2013 in greenfield environments, or in labs and test environments to evaluate new features and test with LOB applications, you can start right away. If you are running an Exchange 2010 or 2007 environment, you’ll need Exchange Server 2010 SP3or 2007 roll up in order to upgrade. We know you are eager to get moving to the new version, so we are hard at work putting the finishing touches on Exchange 2010 SP3 and the roll up, which are on track for release in Q1 of calendar year 2013.

 

If you haven’t already, we encourage you to learn more about Exchange Server 2013 by reviewing TechNet documentation or attending an Ignite training session. It’s a good idea to evaluate prerequisites and system requirements at this time, as well as become familiar with Exchange’s simplified building block architecture, so that you can get a head start on hardwaresizing, planning and purchasing.

 

The EHLO team has been adding more technical content on the new Exchange since the RTM announcement :

 

 

Have a great reading,

 

Cheers,

 

João Ribeiro

Comments

  • Anonymous
    January 01, 2003
    Nice

  • Anonymous
    December 05, 2012
    You said Exch2010 SP3 target is Q1. September's target was H1. Was that a typo or is it more precise now?   Hi,   It's more precise now.   Thanks for your comment.   Cheers,   João Ribeiro