Udostępnij za pośrednictwem

What is a Microsoft Failover Cluster Virtual Adapter anyway?

  • Artykuł

What is a Microsoft Failover Cluster Virtual Adapter anyway?

A question often asked is, "What is the Microsoft Cluster Virtual Adapter and what can I do with it?" The typical, and correct answer, is to leave it alone and let it just work for you. While that answer satisfies most, others may want just a little more by way of an explanation, so hopefully, this blog will provide that.

The networking model in Windows Server 2008 Failover Clustering was rewritten to accommodate new functionality which included being able to obtain IP addresses from DHCP servers and being able to locate Cluster nodes on separate, routed subnets. Additionally, communications went from being UDP Broadcast transmissions to UDP Unicast with a smattering of TCP connections thrown in for good measure. What this all adds up to is more reliable and robust communication connectivity within the Cluster, no matter where the Cluster nodes were located. It no longer matters if Cluster nodes are located in the same physical rack in the same datacenter or in a server rack in a server room in a remote datacenter located at the end of an OC3 WAN connection. This now makes the Cluster more tolerant of single points of failure, e.g. Network Interface Card (NIC) card (and hence the new driver name 'Network Fault-Tolerant or NetFT.sys). The only real minimum requirement is multiple (at least two), redundant communication paths between all nodes in the Cluster. This way, the Cluster network driver (NETFT.SYS) could build a complete routing structure to provide the redundant communication connectivity the Cluster would need to keep applications and services highly available.

Note: Not having at least two networks available for cluster communications will result in a Warning (violation of a 'best practice') being recorded during the Cluster validation process. This is noted in the hardware requirements under Network Adapters and cable section.

To provide some examples of this new functionality and still not get deep into the new networking model, I generated a cluster log from a cluster node so I could illustrate how this new network model is reflected as the cluster service starts. In the cluster log, several entries are associated with NETFT. Some of these include, but may not be limited to, the following:

NETFT - Network Fault-Tolerant
TM - Topology Manager (discovers and maintains the cluster network topology. Reports failures of any networks or network interfaces. configures the Microsoft Failover Cluster Virtual Adapter)
IM - Interface Manager (Responsible for any network interfaces that are part of a cluster configuration)
NETFTAPI - NETFT Application Programming Interface (API)
FTI - Fault-Tolerant Interface

As the cluster service starts, there are events registered indicating NETFT is preparing for communications with other pieces of the cluster architecture -

00000784.000007cc::2009/01/30-14:26:38.199 INFO [NETFT] FTI NetFT event handler ready for events.
00000784.000007b0::2009/01/30-14:26:39.369 INFO [NETFT] Starting NetFT eventing for TM
00000784.000007b0::2009/01/30-14:26:39.369 INFO [NETFT] TM NetFT event handler ready for events.
00000784.000007b0::2009/01/30-14:26:39.369 INFO [CS] Starting IM
00000784.000007b0::2009/01/30-14:26:39.369 INFO [NETFT] Starting NetFT eventing for IM
00000784.000007b0::2009/01/30-14:26:39.369 INFO [NETFT] IM NetFT event handler ready for events.

As connectivity is established with other nodes in the cluster, routes are added -

00000784.00000648::2009/01/30-14:26:39.744 INFO [NETFT] Added route <struct mscs::FaultTolerantRoute>
00000784.00000648::2009/01/30-14:26:39.744 INFO <realLocal>172.16.0.181:~3343~</realLocal>
00000784.00000648::2009/01/30-14:26:39.744 INFO <realRemote>172.16.0.182:~3343~</realRemote>
00000784.00000648::2009/01/30-14:26:39.744 INFO <virtualLocal>fe80::2474:73f1:4b12:8096:~3343~</virtualLocal>
00000784.00000648::2009/01/30-14:26:39.744 INFO <virtualRemote>fe80::8b6:30ea:caa3:8da7:~3343~</virtualRemote>
00000784.00000648::2009/01/30-14:26:39.744 INFO <Delay>1000</Delay>
00000784.00000648::2009/01/30-14:26:39.744 INFO <Threshold>5</Threshold>
00000784.00000648::2009/01/30-14:26:39.744 INFO <Priority>99</Priority>
00000784.00000648::2009/01/30-14:26:39.744 INFO <Attributes>1</Attributes>
00000784.00000648::2009/01/30-14:26:39.744 INFO </struct mscs::FaultTolerantRoute>

Additional events are registered as the routes to the nodes become 'reachable' -

00000784.0000039c::2009/01/30-14:26:39.759 DBG [NETFTAPI] Signaled NetftRemoteReachable event, local address 172.16.0.181:003853 remote address 172.16.0.182:003853
00000784.0000039c::2009/01/30-14:26:39.759 DBG [NETFTAPI] Signaled NetftRemoteReachable event, local address 172.16.0.181:003853 remote address 172.16.0.182:003853
00000784.0000039c::2009/01/30-14:26:39.759 DBG [NETFTAPI] Signaled NetftRemoteReachable event, local address 172.16.0.181:003853 remote address 172.16.0.182:003853
00000784.000004f4::2009/01/30-14:26:39.759 INFO [FTI] Got remote route reachable from netft evm. Setting state to Up for route from 172.16.0.181:~3343~ to 172.16.0.182:~3343~.
00000784.000002f4::2009/01/30-14:26:39.759 INFO [IM] got event: Remote endpoint 172.16.0.182:~3343~ reachable from 172.16.0.181:~3343~
00000784.000002f4::2009/01/30-14:26:39.759 INFO [IM] Marking Route from 172.16.0.181:~3343~ to 172.16.0.182:~3343~ as up
00000784.000001f8::2009/01/30-14:26:39.759 INFO [TM] got event: Remote endpoint 172.16.0.182:~3343~ reachable from 172.16.0.181:~3343~
00000784.00000648::2009/01/30-14:26:39.759 INFO [FTW] NetFT is ready after 0 msecs wait.
00000784.00000648::2009/01/30-14:26:39.759 INFO [FTI] Route is up and NetFT is ready. Connecting to node W2K8-CL2 on virtual IP fe80::8b6:30ea:caa3:8da7%15:~3343~
00000784.0000061c::2009/01/30-14:26:39.759 INFO [CONNECT] fe80::8b6:30ea:caa3:8da7%15:~3343~: Established connection to remote endpoint fe80::8b6:30ea:caa3:8da7%15:~3343~.

A consequence of the changes made to the Cluster networking model is the fact that the Cluster network driver now manifests itself as a network adapter, a hidden adapter, but an adapter nonetheless. image

While this is hidden from normal view (by default) in Device Manager (must select “Show hidden devices” to see it), it is plainly visible when listing the network configuration of a Cluster node using the ipconfig /all command line. image

Like other adapters, the Microsoft Failover Cluster Virtual Adapter has a MAC address and both IPv4 and IPv6 addresses assigned to it. The IPv4 address is an Automatic Private Internet Protocol Addressing (APIPA) address and the IPv6 address is a non-routable Link-Local address, but that does not matter as all cluster communications are tunneled through the networks supported by the physical NICs as shown here using the route information obtained during the cluster service startup. image

The MAC address that is assigned to the Microsoft Failover Cluster Virtual Adapter is based on the MAC address of one of the physical NICs image

The Cluster network driver (netft.sys) is a kernel mode driver and is started and stopped by the Cluster Service. image

The Cluster network driver has an entry under HKLMSystemCurrentControlSetServices. image

Additionally, there is an entry for the Microsoft Failover Cluster Virtual Adapter in the routing table for each Cluster node. Here are sample outputs for the three sections of the route print command executed on a Cluster node. The first part shows the listing of all the interfaces on the node. Interface 15 is the Microsoft Failover Cluster Virtual Adapter. image

This next screen shows the IPv4 Route Table which reflects three entries for the Microsoft Failover Cluster Virtual Adapter. image

And finally, the adapter appears in the IPv6 Route Table (If 15). image

So, how can one get in trouble? Here are a couple of ways:

  1. Disable the Microsoft Failover Cluster Virtual Adapter.
  2. Sysprep an installation of Windows Server 2008, 2008R2, or 2012 with the Failover Cluster feature installed. This will cause an error in the Cluster Validation Process. Windows 2012R2 can be sysprepped with the Failover Feature installed.
  3. Modifying any properties of the adapter.

Hopefully, this gives you a better feel for this new functionality in Windows Server 2008 Failover Clusters, and like I stated at the beginning of the blog, the correct answer is to not do anything to the adapter - just let it work for you. Thanks and we hope this has been helpful.

Chuck Timon and John Marlin
Senior Support Escalation Engineers
Microsoft Enterprise Platforms Support

Comments

  • Anonymous
    January 01, 2003
    hello, here Cesar Antolin, I have the same problem as Ed Skolnik :
    The problem is this virtual or hidden adapter IP address then shows up when you ping the local host name instead of the actuly assigned IP address of the server. This messes with name resoultion when software tries resolve the host name via ping.

    Some Answer?
  • Anonymous
    January 01, 2003
    What tool did you use in the screenshot which shows the drivers and their status?Regards,Thomas
  • Anonymous
    January 01, 2003
    Hi Chuck and Johnyou just provided valuable info here on how cluster network communication works.I 'm just having problem configuring 2 cluster nodes with their own firewall enabled.The cluster validation utility is reporting bad firewall configuration , without saying which rule group is misconfigured ,even if node failover is working fine!So can you provide us a list of firewall exception rules should that should be setted up for 2 ( or more ) cluster 2008 nodes?thanks for your preciuos work
  • Anonymous
    January 01, 2003
    The comment has been removed
  • Anonymous
    January 01, 2003
    Good info, thanks!
  • Anonymous
    October 19, 2010
    Thanks for explaining this.I first noticed this adapter when performed a ping of the local host name as it reply's on this adapter!MattMC
  • Anonymous
    December 08, 2010
    Thanks for the info. I searched and found this article when the phenomenom occurred.Strange thing is that this adapter only exists on one of my nodes and only after reinstalling it.I run a two node Hyper-V cluster on 2008 R2. When we set it up a few month ago there was no Cluster Virtual Adapters on any of the nodes. Due to hardware problems on one of the nodes we have re-installed it. First evicted the node in the cluster and cleaned out all traces of the old account and then reinstalled OS from scratc on the new server and then joined the cluster. This "Microsoft Failover Cluster Virtual Adapter" now turned up on the newly installed node but does not exist on the other.On another cluster I manage which is also a two node 2008 R2 Hyper-V there are no such adapters.Is there a change in this behaviour between 2008 and 2008 R2?How come this adapter only shows up on one of the nodes in one of the clusters?/Mats
  • Anonymous
    January 03, 2011
    Jeff,Great article! thanks for the explanation. Also, I think that in your "how to get in trouble" section, you should include the fact that some companies have the "DHCP client" disabled as a server policy. This requires some explanation as to why is it needed even tough no Dynamic IPs are required
  • Anonymous
    January 03, 2011
    Jeff,Great article! thanks for the explanation. Also, I think that in your "how to get in trouble" section, you should include the fact that some companies have the "DHCP client" disabled as a server policy. This requires some explanation as to why is it needed even tough no Dynamic IPs are required
  • Anonymous
    January 03, 2011
    Jeff,Great article! thanks for the explanation. Also, I think that in your "how to get in trouble" section, you should include the fact that some companies have the "DHCP client" disabled as a server policy. This requires some explanation as to why is it needed even tough no Dynamic IPs are required
  • Anonymous
    March 30, 2011
    The problem is this virtual or hidden adapter IP address then shows up when you ping the local host name instead of the actuly assigned IP address of   the server. This messes with name resoultion when software tries  resolve the host name via ping.
  • Anonymous
    August 31, 2012
    The comment has been removed
  • Anonymous
    March 28, 2013
    Hi Chuck and John,while searching a solution for an issue we currently have in a 2012 Hyper-V Cluster, I've seen your blog entry. One Cluster Node stops with a bugcheck, following are debug details:PROCESS_OBJECT: fffffa809d6ad980DEFAULT_BUCKET_ID:  WIN8_DRIVER_FAULTBUGCHECK_STR:  0x9EPROCESS_NAME:  SystemCURRENT_IRQL:  2TAG_NOT_DEFINED_c000000f:  FFFFF88003563FB0LAST_CONTROL_TRANSFER:  from fffff88000ce4845 to fffff802abef3040FOLLOWUP_IP:netft!NetftProcessWatchdogEvent+ddfffff880`00ce4845 cc              int     3SYMBOL_STACK_INDEX:  1SYMBOL_NAME:  netft!NetftProcessWatchdogEvent+ddFOLLOWUP_NAME:  MachineOwnerMODULE_NAME: netftIMAGE_NAME:  netft.sysDEBUG_FLR_IMAGE_TIMESTAMP:  5010aa07BUCKET_ID_FUNC_OFFSET:  ddFAILURE_BUCKET_ID:  0x9E_netft!NetftProcessWatchdogEventBUCKET_ID:  0x9E_netft!NetftProcessWatchdogEventFollowup: MachineOwnerHopefully you got any idea how to resolve this issue. OS is Windows 2012 Datacenter, all updates installed.Thanks,Jens
  • Anonymous
    April 21, 2013
    Thanks a lot for the detailed information; it's really useful.BTW, I am having troubles with the "Microsoft Failover Cluster Virtual Adapter" on of the SQL 2008 cluster nodes. I was upgrading the NIC firmware/driver on this server and after this the "Microsoft Failover Cluster Virtual Adapter" is missing from the server (I can't see it in device manager). I am getting the below error:"The Cluster Service was unable to access network adapter 'Microsoft Failover Cluster Virtual Miniport'. Verify that other network adapters are functioning properly and check the device manager for errors associated with adapter 'Microsoft Failover Cluster Virtual Miniport'. If the configuration for adapter 'Microsoft Failover Cluster Virtual Miniport' has been changed, it may become necessary to reinstall the failover clustering feature on this computer."I refereed to support.microsoft.com/.../973838, but it suggests to re-install failover-cluster :-( is there any other way to fix this?Thanks,Chetan
  • Anonymous
    November 10, 2013
    Great Information.
  • Anonymous
    April 08, 2014
    How does installing the hotfix for running VMXNET3 adapters?

    http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-US;2344941
  • Anonymous
    April 10, 2014
    Thanks for this article. I'm a little late to the party, however I noticed a cluster today where the Failover Cluster Virtual Adapter is running at 10Gbps even though the physical NICs are 1Gbps. I'll leave it alone, but it looks odd, and I'd like to understand why.
  • Anonymous
    June 02, 2014
    Hi John and Chuck,

    I've got multiple Windows 2012 cluster and on all, when I ping any other server (including the partner server), the response take 2-3 seconds. I've made sure the binding order is correct, from advanced setting and also registry (linkage->binding). Using network monitor I was able to find that request is first picked up by failover virtual adapter. When it cannot resolve it is passed onto the correct gateway. The routing table is standard. Also change the metric value so the public interface gets preference, but even that doesn't fix the issue. It is appening across all the 2012 cluster server (physical and virtual).
    Any suggestions?

    Regards,
    Mitesh
  • Anonymous
    December 04, 2014
    Cesar, you have to use the nvspbind.exe utility to modify the binding order, thereby pushing the Virtual adapter down below the NIC that holds the address you want to respond to the ping. Moving it down will then allow the physical adapter to respond.

    https://gallery.technet.microsoft.com/Hyper-V-Network-VSP-Bind-cf937850
  • Anonymous
    July 20, 2015
    Hi Chuck,

    interesting post.
    I have a question: which tool did you use to show the kernel driver status ?

    Thank you in advance,

    Simone
  • Anonymous
    September 21, 2015
    The comment has been removed