다음을 통해 공유


Bindings for Workgroups

What's the fastest binding for securely communicating over an intranet? How about if the client and server don't share a domain?

A lot of attention gets paid to Internet configurations, where HTTP rules the world. HTTP is so dominant in that environment because it is a very open and standardized protocol. Servers that support HTTP as their primary network transport protocol have a lot of reach. It's easy to write clients that connect to these servers, which means a lot more clients will get written than would be the case if the server used some obscure network transport protocol.

The world is completely different on an intranet because suddenly reach is no longer a critical factor for adoption. It is possible to use both political and technical means to control the technology that the client and server commonly share. This sharing is helpful in a lot of ways because it allows the use of specialized network transport protocols that are faster and more efficient than the standardized protocols. By removing the requirement of reach, it is possible to do better at meeting other requirements, such as performance.

In the general case, the fastest transport in WCF for communicating between machines is the TCP transport. The fastest encoding in WCF is the binary message encoder. Since we control the technology in this scenario, we can enforce support for these protocols. That combination is the default setting for the NetTcpBinding. However, NetTcp has other features turned on by default that take back some of these performance advantages. For example, leaving security enabled is going to roughly cut the network transfer performance of TCP in half. Security is an example of a desirable feature with significant cost, but allows you to get away with not paying if you don't need the feature. That's the essence of the "pay as you go" model.

We need security in this case, but we can go with the lightest strategy for securing the connection. Without a trust relationship between the client and server, we can't rely on a third-party service to broker trust between us. The simple and direct approach in this case is to use NetTcp with transport security and rely on the plain old Windows NTLM authentication. NTLM is pretty cheap and allows us to use the basic username and password model for transferring data to a remote machine.

Next time: Actions for FaultExceptions

Comments

  • Anonymous
    February 02, 2007
    myITforum Daily Newsletter Daily Newsletter February 2, 2007 The myITforum.com newsletter is delivered

  • Anonymous
    February 02, 2007
    I'm working on an application that processes many large messages at the same time. The messages should

  • Anonymous
    May 28, 2007
    Choosing a Communication Technology