다음을 통해 공유


"yip-yip-yahoo"!

Comments

  • Anonymous
    January 13, 2008
    PingBack from http://geeklectures.info/2008/01/13/yip-yip-yahoo/

  • Anonymous
    January 13, 2008
    The comment has been removed

  • Anonymous
    January 13, 2008
    G-G-google ... ?!?!

  • Anonymous
    January 13, 2008
    I take this means you are finished with adressing the disposition of all comments with Ecma!

  • Anonymous
    January 13, 2008
    Yeah, I saw his post too. :-) He probably never read any of the progress notes, specification drafts, requests for comment and participation, the developer site etc. http://www.ecma-international.org/memento/TC45-M.htm

  • Anonymous
    January 13, 2008
    The comment has been removed

  • Anonymous
    January 15, 2008
    First, congratulations for slogging through the paper.  It is hard work. http://www.consortiuminfo.org/standardsblog/article.php?story=20080114105017559 Weirder and weirder. The next tactic will be to bring in fresh blood to critique the submission and if that doesn't work, to assail the process.  I think one accepts the fact that when OOXML passes, the supporters will say it is a victory for opening Microsoft to cooperative standards making and the opposition will say it is a result of corruption.  No minds will be changed but possibly the MS customers will get a better more competitive market for their information. Just keep to the solid work and ignore the rest.  Glasnost is not a reason for a riot.

  • Anonymous
    January 16, 2008
    I absolutely do not see how tools for converting some binary format to some random XML help to understand the meaning of the file format. Converting from binary format to XML just is like transliterating chinese glyphs to latin glyphs: No gain of understanding, plus the risk of loosing information. Sorry for being that negative, but to me this step just looks like fog spread for distraction.

  • Anonymous
    April 01, 2008
    The comment has been removed