Freedom and Coexistence: The XML World

Just came to know that Commonwealth of Massachusetts included Open XML as an acceptable document format for office applications along with the Open Document Format (ODF).

Statement on ETRM v4.0 Public Review Comments - August 1, 2007 says that:

The Commonwealth continues on its path toward open, XML-based document formats without reflecting a vendor or commercial bias in ETRM v4.0. Many of the comments we received identify concerns regarding the Open XML specification.  We believe that these concerns, as with those regarding ODF, are appropriately handled through the standards setting process, and we expect both standards to evolve and improve. Moreover, we believe that the impact of any legitimate concerns raised about either standard is outweighed substantially by the benefits of moving toward open, XML-based document format standards. Therefore, we will be moving forward to include both ODF and Open XML as acceptable document formats. All comments received are posted on this web site.

More information on this is on doug's blog post titled "Massachusetts ETRM V4.0 recommends Open XML and ODF 1.1". I also found its reference on ACTOnline.

One more interesting blog post on this from Jason titled "Policy Makers Being Balanced & Reasonable". He also noticed one very important point of the whole story (that I somehow missed :( ).

Information that traditionally has been presented in text form is increasingly being enriched through the use of multimedia data types such as graphics, audio and video. The variety of data formats used however raises concerns regarding interoperability and accessibility. Given that XML is the cornerstone of the Commonwealth’s Service Oriented Architecture (SOA) vision of a unified enterprise information environment, it is crucial that the schema used to create XML files meet the open format definition as well. The target state is the ubiquitous use of open formats to capture and store data within applications and in individual data files. - MA ETRM Domain: Information - v 4.0 linked 8/1/2007

If you ask me ..this whole thing makes a lot of sense, multiple standards have been existed historically and this is surely a positive step in enabling greater customer choice.  

I am a strong believer of "freedom of choice", for me "free" as in choice  is always more important than "free" as in beer (except on weekends ;)). So this news gave me a the goody-good feeling of the week.

At the highest level, the ETRM specifies XML as the core technology to enable data interoperability. After noting that "XML has become the lingua franca of application integration, facilitating application interoperability," the ETRM makes the following recommendation:

"Agencies should consider the use of XML for all projects, and should implement XML, unless there are compelling business reasons not to do so. XML should always be considered when undertaking new work or when beginning a major overhaul of an existing system."

What it has in store for you ? Well, you can easily see the future (IMHO) just by replacing  Agencies to organizations .. private, public.. consumer etc.

So, don't wait - and move on to the world of choice, world of coexistence .

 

del.icio.us tags: Open XML, ODF, OOXML, Office 2007, Pranav Wagh, Microsoft Blogger

Technorati tags: Open XML, ODF, OOXML, Office 2007, Pranav Wagh, Microsoft Blogger

Comments

• Anonymous
  August 01, 2007
  PingBack from http://xml.webmasterswatch.com/2007/08/02/freedom-and-coexistence-the-xml-world/

• Anonymous
  August 01, 2007
  Just came to know that Commonwealth of Massachusetts included Open XML as an acceptable document format

• Anonymous
  August 03, 2007
  Thanks for the link to the ACT Release.  Here is my recent post on the policy.  It's nice that Mass added OoXML, Rich Text Format, and the newest versions of the Open Document Format (ODF) and Portable Document Format (PDF).  However, the fact they are bending their own rules to include PDF, RTF and even the newest ODF demonstrates the silliness of the basic policy.  Rather than focus on technology mandates, the Commonwealth should give its agencies goals of interop and longterm document access and then let them do their jobs. http://blog.actonline.org/2007/08/mass-officially.html