Partager via


Help Is For Experts

One of the most interesting epiphanies I've had over the last few years seems on
the surface like a paradox: "help" in Office is mostly used by experts and
enthusiasts.

How can this be?  I think my biased assumption was that experts know how to
use the software already and eager novices would be poring over the
documentation trying to learn how to be more effective using it.

Yet, in usability tests we see it again and again: novices and intermediates
click around and experiment, experts try to reason things out and look them up
in help.

Why is that?  I don't know the answer, but I can speculate.

Most help today is designed around the model of answering a question.  You
type the keyword into the search box, or browse through an index, and an
explanatory article comes up.  So far, so good--assuming you know exactly
the name of the command or concept you want to look up.  Unfortunately,
this is something experts are far more likely to be in tune with.

So, maybe you don't know the term "mail merge", but the help system is smart and
you type "print holiday letter" and it brings up "mail merge" as a possible hit. 
You still have to recognize that "mail merge" is the right answer to "print
holiday letter."


Help me!

I think help is getting better at linking people to articles that are more
around scenarios and walkthroughs, but the terminology barrier is still
there--and experts are the people most likely to know the "magic" words to bring
up what they're looking for.

Another reason help tends to not be used by beginners may be that help is not
really conducive to learning.  It's more like a recipe than a community
college course.  The official line on manuals is "no one reads manuals" and
maybe that's true, but there are a lot of people buying books to learn
how to use software.  (There's even a popular series of books called
"missing manuals.")

A book is way better than help if you're trying to become familiar with a piece
of software--it has a narrative, it might be funny sometimes, you can take it
into your bed with you, and it's designed to teach, not to troubleshoot.

The night more than two years ago when I decided to leave Outlook and take the
job working on the Office user interface, my first action was to go Barnes &
Noble and buy a thick book about Excel.  I felt like I knew it less well
than Word and PowerPoint, and I wanted to learn everything it was capable of. 
It's no surprise I didn't press F1 instead; that's not really what traditional
"help" was designed for.

Help also requires a context switch today.  The process of experimenting
with the product to see what is in it and what it's capable of is totally
removed from opening the help window and looking inside to see articles are in
there.  To the extent that people learn the software through playing with
it, they never experience the value of help.  The product organization and
the help organization are two different, often non-complementary, attempts to
rationalize the capability of the software.  We haven't done a good job of
building the right bridges between them.

Of course, there may be a lot of other factors which contribute to the varied
usage of help.  For instance, no one really needs an article on "Bold";
perhaps experts use more of the powerful and involved features, and thus benefit
from the help system more.

Alan Cooper talks about "perpetual intermediates" in The
Inmates Are Running the Asylum
.  The idea, paraphrased, is that
most people using software are "intermediates."  Beginners don't stay that
way for long, but most people don't have the time, energy, or desire to become
truly elite "experts."  I believe that it is precisely these intermediates
who don't rely on the help system.  In fact, they might be defined by their
general unwillingness to look features up in the "command encyclopedia." 
Experience shows that intermediates tend to explore the product, not the help
system.

None of this is intended as a specific dig against help by the way.  I do
think that help can continue to improve, and for sure the internet community
itself is the world's most powerful help system. 
Office Online in particular is a
second-to-none portal for all things Office, and they really have pushed the
bounds of what you can do in creating community around assistance, templates,
support, and learning.  In fact, I'm actually bullish on help, and later
this week I'll introduce how we've integrated it into the Ribbon in an attempt
to introduce even more people to help.

But it's worth noting that if you're authoring your help system for newcomers,
you might be designing for the wrong kind of person.

Comments

  • Anonymous
    November 29, 2005
    The comment has been removed

  • Anonymous
    November 29, 2005
    The comment has been removed

  • Anonymous
    November 29, 2005
    The comment has been removed

  • Anonymous
    November 29, 2005
    The comment has been removed

  • Anonymous
    November 29, 2005
    I stoped using office help around Office 98, at that point it time it became invasive and hard to use. I dread hitting F1 in Word, knowing that it will result in a minute or two load time, my window being moved around to fit the help on screen thus hiding the bit I was trying to use help for.

    And after all that, I just can't look up something, I have to go through the search. Usualy I start at the bottom of the results as that's where what I want really is.

    Help is very unhelpfull in Office.

  • Anonymous
    November 29, 2005
    The comment has been removed

  • Anonymous
    November 29, 2005
    Online help is neat. I once found an Excel function in the help that required I install one of the add-in tools to use it, but the help didn't mention this add-in at all. So I did a google search and found out what I needed to do to use this function. Well, luckily the online help has a "comments" section for each help sheet, and I entered a comment that said the help should mention that you need to install an add-in to use this function. Sure enough, I checked a few weeks later and the help page had been updated with the additional information I provided. It was nice to see that my comments actually had an effect to improve the help system.

  • Anonymous
    November 29, 2005
    J:

    That's a great story... that's the whole point of the online help, that it can get better over time. Hopefully there's a lot of this going on!

    Someone mentioned wiki above... I guess the online help system in Office 2003 is kind of a moderated wiki of sorts... (which some would say is no wiki at all... :) )

  • Anonymous
    November 29, 2005
    I have to agree that the online help in Office is not the best. It is a great product, but when I need help I usually give up after examining the first 50 hits and the move directly to Google. I agree with everything Gabe and Tyler wrote.

  • Anonymous
    November 29, 2005
    I keep Office 97 on my PC just for the help.

    I find the help in 2003 is too confusing with far too many results to a question. 97 is straight to the point.

  • Anonymous
    November 29, 2005
    Should I watch for Jensen's book on the new Office UI then in bookstores next year? :)

  • Anonymous
    November 29, 2005
    The comment has been removed

  • Anonymous
    November 29, 2005
    The comment has been removed

  • Anonymous
    November 29, 2005
    OR

    Maybe the experts are experts because they took the time to navigate through help to learn the product.

  • Anonymous
    November 29, 2005
    The comment has been removed

  • Anonymous
    November 29, 2005
    First, I would like everybody to carify what they mean when they refer to "online" help. I always thought that online help was what shipped in the help file and was shown when you press F1, while offline help was something that you found in a book. It seems that now "online" has been changed to mean what shows up on the Internet. If so, then what do you call the help that shows up when you press F1?

    Regarding relevance, I would suggest adopting Google's algorithms for ranking. A Google search for "Excel operators" yields what I was looking for ("About calculation operators") as the second hit from Microsoft, with another relevant document (differences between 1-2-3 and Excel operators) being first. Excel 2002's help gives rankings 4 and 14 respectively, with most of the other hits having nothing whatsoever to do with operators. How can 3 articles that don't contain the word I'm searching for be more relevant than the article which has the word in its title and contains it 28 times? At least in this case, more words would not help; "What operators can I use in a formula" does not yield any different results than just "operators".

  • Anonymous
    November 29, 2005
    hey jensen,

    one thing you should note is that there is a reason experts are experts in the first place. In "Ask Marilyn" from Parade magazine, someone writes to her and asks what makes a person smart. Marilyn vos Savant replies the one who know where to look for info.

    No one knows everything in the world and no one should know everything. They should know though on how to know. The reason experts are experts is because they are smart enough to think of "help" in the first place.

  • Anonymous
    November 29, 2005
    I read this post with great interest. The comments posted so far are also very insightful. I’d like to summarize some of the points I felt to be particularly salient as well as add a few of my own thoughts.

    *There are plenty of people that buy books but do not read them. Just pointing out that sometimes even the format of help docs can’t offset people’s aversion to reading or refusal to dedicate time and energy to something when they can limp along without doing so.

    *I kept hoping Jensen would take credit for what I think is easily the best improvement to online help in office since clippy (joke): integrating help into the apps via expanded “tooltips” directly in the galleries. I’m really looking forward to this.

    *I practically never use online help. However, I literally live and die by Google Groups. I am almost never the only person to encounter a problem or misunderstand a feature and Google Groups usually proves a much faster route to success. Someone mentioned making online help include a Wiki format. I couldn’t have come up with a better way to merge Google Groups with MS online help.

    *If help takes longer to load than a browser window takes to open, we have a problem.

    *There’s been lots of talk about F1 and dialogs. I’m glad to see that feature come back.

    *Regarding one post’s comments about the fantastic Visual Studio online help (wherein positioning the cursor on a method/property and press F1 automatically opens relevant help files), what about a right-click option in the ribbon for immediate help on a feature? It’s not as cut and dry as Visual Studio, but it might be worth a little user testing.

    Another thought provoking post. Thanks!

  • Anonymous
    November 29, 2005
    The comment has been removed

  • Anonymous
    November 29, 2005
    The comment has been removed

  • Anonymous
    November 30, 2005
    You know Andrew, you got me thinking. There has to be a way some of the VS help features could be in word. For example you could click once on something in the ribbon it move your mouse over it or Right click it or something. Something that would pull up information ditectly on the button you click on.

  • Anonymous
    November 30, 2005
    The comment has been removed

  • Anonymous
    November 30, 2005
    The comment has been removed

  • Anonymous
    November 30, 2005
    "*If help takes longer to load than a browser window takes to open, we have a problem."

    "What I DON'T want is [...] a help system that resizes the main window whenever it appears."

    Hear, hear!

    I have stopped using help in Office and just rely on Google. The replies are more relevant and better sorted, and it's faster. Even if the answer turns out to reside on the Office Assistance site, it's easier to find it there with Google. (And let's not even mention the documentation for VS2005 that takes at least 10 seconds to start on my home PC.)

    In fact I've disabled the F1 key in Excel because it's too close to F2 and Esc (both very important keys). I kept hitting it by accident and then had to spend time closing it.

    On a more UI-related topic, the Assistance Pane in Office 2003 (and all the other task panes) suffer from one major annoyance: there doesn't seem to be a keyboard shortcut for closing them. I can hit Esc to get back to the spreadsheet / document, but the pane stays there. Anything that can be brought up with a single key press should also be closeable through the keyboard.

    But since task panes will not have such a central role in Office12 I'm hoping that this won't be occurring in O12!

  • Anonymous
    November 30, 2005
    Mike Kelly from Office Online has a blog here: http://blogs.msdn.com/mikekelly/ (he also posted comments above). This details some of the ongoing work that's being done with help in Office 12.

  • Anonymous
    November 30, 2005
    Another case where your software comment seems unaware that there's a larger context. (I zinged you about that last week, too.) Don't mean to pick on you about it, but perhaps you software designers need to spend some time in a real office.

    A story: My wife, whose title is "lead worker," spends much of her day answering other folks' questions. Her normal response is to reach for the appropriate manual, locate the relevant page, and read the answer to the questioner. Sometimes she makes them read it to her, just for variety.

    Here's the really odd thing: Twenty years ago I had Joan's job, and I was doing the same thing. Same questioners, same questions, same manuals. Really. There's a clue in this story about something.

    I don't think a help system can fix that. I do think Office's help system could be more helpful for those of us who actually do use it. My personal complaints pretty much match the ones which have already been listed. Obviously you folks are giving that some thought, which is encouraging.

    Despite the cheap shot at the top of this note, I love your blog. Thanks for the work.

  • Anonymous
    November 30, 2005
    I think the real reason only expert users use help is that you have to be an expert to understand the system.

    Office is a great collection of software, but the comments above really should give you a hint: the help system is broken and unhelpful. If even the readers of a blog about the Office user interface can't figure it out there is something seriously wrong with it.

    I agree with the posters who claimed the help system has gotten worse with every version during the last ten years.

  • Anonymous
    November 30, 2005
    >That's why using more words in your query
    >("type a question for help" - not a word) may
    >help improve your results.

    One of the most important usability guidelines is that software should behave like users expect it to behave. The problem with the Office approach to help - asking questions with natural language - is that this isn't how people are used to interact with computers. I seem to recall that the majority of querys on Google are one word queries. Why would you expect that your users behave differently?

    I miss the old WinHelp dialogs - intuitive contents, a fast index, and a fulltext search. I don't understand today's system at all. And it's to slow to be usable. I use Google Groups instead.

  • Anonymous
    November 30, 2005
    It might be interesting to see an application that, when asked for context-sensitive or AnswerWizard-like help, would open a browser window with an appropriate Google query :) (Of course, this assumes that the user has an Internet connection so some kind of offline help is also needed.)

  • Anonymous
    December 02, 2005
    I'm sure you mean an MSN Search query.

  • Anonymous
    June 06, 2006
    PingBack from http://www.epictrends.com/usability-technical-writing-copywriting-multimedia/?p=397

  • Anonymous
    July 23, 2006
    PingBack from http://techwritetips.wordpress.com/2006/05/03/what-is-vista-office-help/

  • Anonymous
    August 04, 2006
    PingBack from http://www.zuschlogin.com/?p=14

  • Anonymous
    January 30, 2007
    PingBack from http://ixdesign.blogit.kauppalehti.fi/2007/01/31/kayttoohjeet-ovat-eksperteille/

  • Anonymous
    February 04, 2007
    PingBack from http://fly.ingsparks.de/2005-12-01/hilfe-funktionen-helfen-nur-experten/

  • Anonymous
    May 31, 2007
    PingBack from http://cardbox.wordpress.com/2005/12/01/can-you-learn-anything-from-bits/

  • Anonymous
    December 13, 2007
    PingBack from http://www.wadiwallah.com/blog/2007/12/13/help-is-for-experts/

  • Anonymous
    June 13, 2008
    PingBack from http://jayleen.yourdigestbook.info/o2k3exceltipstabs.html

  • Anonymous
    January 04, 2009
    PingBack from http://www.ultrasaurus.com/wordpress/?p=205

  • Anonymous
    May 26, 2009
    PingBack from http://castironbakeware.info/story.php?title=jensen-harris-an-office-user-interface-blog-help-is-for-experts

  • Anonymous
    May 27, 2009
    PingBack from http://chikul09blog.wordpress.com/2009/05/27/de-hulp-functie-alleen-maar-voor-expert-gebruikers/

  • Anonymous
    May 29, 2009
    PingBack from http://paidsurveyshub.info/story.php?title=jensen-harris-an-office-user-interface-blog-help-is-for-experts

  • Anonymous
    May 31, 2009
    PingBack from http://indoorgrillsrecipes.info/story.php?id=2228

  • Anonymous
    June 12, 2009
    PingBack from http://cellulitecreamsite.info/story.php?id=643

  • Anonymous
    June 15, 2009
    PingBack from http://unemploymentofficeresource.info/story.php?id=4432