Muokkaa

Jaa


Row level security policy

Applies to: ✅ Microsoft FabricAzure Data Explorer

Use group membership or execution context to control access to rows in a database table.

Row Level Security (RLS) simplifies the design and coding of security. It lets you apply restrictions on data row access in your application. For example, limit user access to rows relevant to their department, or restrict customer access to only the data relevant to their company.

The access restriction logic is located in the database tier, rather than away from the data in another application tier. The database system applies the access restrictions every time data access is attempted from any tier. This logic makes your security system more reliable and robust by reducing the surface area of your security system.

RLS lets you provide access to other applications and users, only to a certain portion of a table. For example, you might want to:

  • Grant access only to rows that meet some criteria
  • Anonymize data in some of the columns
  • All of the above

Note

When an RLS policy is enabled on a table, access is entirely replaced by the RLS query that's defined on the table. The access restriction applies to all users, including database admins and the RLS creator. The RLS query must explicitly include definitions for all types of users to whom you want to give access.

For more information, see management commands for managing the Row Level Security policy.

Tip

These functions are often useful for row_level_security queries:

Limitations

  • There's no limit on the number of tables on which Row Level Security policy can be configured.
  • Row Level Security policy cannot be configured on External Tables.
  • The RLS policy can't be enabled on a table under the following circumstances:
  • The RLS query can't reference tables located in other databases.

Examples

Limit access to Sales table

In a table named Sales, each row contains details about a sale. One of the columns contains the name of the salesperson. Instead of giving your salespeople access to all records in Sales, enable a Row Level Security policy on this table to only return records where the salesperson is the current user:

Sales | where SalesPersonAadUser == current_principal()

You can also mask the email address:

Sales | where SalesPersonAadUser == current_principal() | extend EmailAddress = "****"

If you want every sales person to see all the sales of a specific country/region, you can define a query similar to:

let UserToCountryMapping = datatable(User:string, Country:string)
[
  "john@domain.com", "USA",
  "anna@domain.com", "France"
];
Sales
| where Country in ((UserToCountryMapping | where User == current_principal_details()["UserPrincipalName"] | project Country))

If you have a group that contains the managers, you might want to give them access to all rows. Here's the query for the Row Level Security policy.

let IsManager = current_principal_is_member_of('aadgroup=sales_managers@domain.com');
let AllData = Sales | where IsManager;
let PartialData = Sales | where not(IsManager) and (SalesPersonAadUser == current_principal()) | extend EmailAddress = "****";
union AllData, PartialData

Expose different data to members of different Microsoft Entra groups

If you have multiple Microsoft Entra groups, and you want the members of each group to see a different subset of data, use this structure for an RLS query.

Customers
| where (current_principal_is_member_of('aadgroup=group1@domain.com') and <filtering specific for group1>) or
        (current_principal_is_member_of('aadgroup=group2@domain.com') and <filtering specific for group2>) or
        (current_principal_is_member_of('aadgroup=group3@domain.com') and <filtering specific for group3>)

Apply the same RLS function on multiple tables

First, define a function that receives the table name as a string parameter, and references the table using the table() operator.

For example:

.create-or-alter function RLSForCustomersTables(TableName: string) {
    table(TableName)
    | ...
}

Then configure RLS on multiple tables this way:

.alter table Customers1 policy row_level_security enable "RLSForCustomersTables('Customers1')"
.alter table Customers2 policy row_level_security enable "RLSForCustomersTables('Customers2')"
.alter table Customers3 policy row_level_security enable "RLSForCustomersTables('Customers3')"

Produce an error upon unauthorized access

If you want nonauthorized table users to receive an error instead of returning an empty table, use the assert() function. The following example shows you how to produce this error in an RLS function:

.create-or-alter function RLSForCustomersTables() {
    MyTable
    | where assert(current_principal_is_member_of('aadgroup=mygroup@mycompany.com') == true, "You don't have access")
}

You can combine this approach with other examples. For example, you can display different results to users in different Microsoft Entra groups, and produce an error for everyone else.

Control permissions on follower databases

The RLS policy that you configure on the production database will also take effect in the follower databases. You can’t configure different RLS policies on the production and follower databases. However, you can use the current_cluster_endpoint() function in your RLS query to achieve the same effect, as having different RLS queries in follower tables.

For example:

.create-or-alter function RLSForCustomersTables() {
    let IsProductionCluster = current_cluster_endpoint() == "mycluster.eastus.kusto.windows.net";
    let DataForProductionCluster = TempTable | where IsProductionCluster;
    let DataForFollowerClusters = TempTable | where not(IsProductionCluster) | extend EmailAddress = "****";
    union DataForProductionCluster, DataForFollowerClusters
}

Note

The RLS function above has no performance impact whatsoever on queries on the leader cluster. The performance impact on queries on the follower clusters will be impacted only by the complexity of DataForFollowerClusters.

Control permissions on shortcut databases

The RLS policy that you configure on the production database will also take effect in the shortcut databases. You can’t configure different RLS policies on the production and shortcut databases. However, you can use the current_cluster_endpoint() function in your RLS query to achieve the same effect, as having different RLS queries in shortcut tables.

For example:

.create-or-alter function RLSForCustomersTables() {
    let IsProductionCluster = current_cluster_endpoint() == "mycluster.eastus.kusto.windows.net";
    let DataForProductionCluster = TempTable | where IsProductionCluster;
    let DataForFollowerClusters = TempTable | where not(IsProductionCluster) | extend EmailAddress = "****";
    union DataForProductionCluster, DataForFollowerClusters
}

Note

The RLS function above has no performance impact whatsoever on queries on the source database. The performance impact on queries on the shortcut databases will be impacted only by the complexity of DataForFollowerClusters.

More use cases

  • A call center support person may identify callers by several digits of their social security number. This number shouldn't be fully exposed to the support person. An RLS policy can be applied on the table to mask all but the last four digits of the social security number in the result set of any query.
  • Set an RLS policy that masks personally identifiable information (PII), and enables developers to query production environments for troubleshooting purposes without violating compliance regulations.
  • A hospital can set an RLS policy that allows nurses to view data rows for their patients only.
  • A bank can set an RLS policy to restrict access to financial data rows based on an employee's business division or role.
  • A multi-tenant application can store data from many tenants in a single tableset (which is efficient). They would use an RLS policy to enforce a logical separation of each tenant's data rows from every other tenant's rows, so each tenant can see only its data rows.

Performance impact on queries

When an RLS policy is enabled on a table, there will be some performance impact on queries that access that table. Access to the table will be replaced by the RLS query that's defined on that table. The performance impact of an RLS query will normally consist of two parts:

  • Membership checks in Microsoft Entra ID: Checks are efficient. You can check membership in tens, or even hundreds of groups without major impact on the query performance.
  • Filters, joins, and other operations that are applied on the data: Impact depends on the complexity of the query

For example:

let IsRestrictedUser = current_principal_is_member_of('aadgroup=some_group@domain.com');
let AllData = MyTable | where not(IsRestrictedUser);
let PartialData = MyTable | where IsRestrictedUser and (...);
union AllData, PartialData

If the user isn't part of some_group@domain.com, then IsRestrictedUser is evaluated to false. The query that is evaluated is similar to this one:

let AllData = MyTable;           // the condition evaluates to `true`, so the filter is dropped
let PartialData = <empty table>; // the condition evaluates to `false`, so the whole expression is replaced with an empty table
union AllData, PartialData       // this will just return AllData, as PartialData is empty

Similarly, if IsRestrictedUser evaluates to true, then only the query for PartialData will be evaluated.

Improve query performance when RLS is used

Performance impact on ingestion

There's no performance impact on ingestion.