Jaa


Commitment Failures, Not Just a Failed Love Story

I was working on a debug the other day when I ran the “!vm” command and saw that the system had some 48,000 commit requests that failed. This was strange as the system was not out of memory and the page file was not full. I was left scratching my head and thinking “I wish I knew where !vm got that information from.” So I went on a quest to find out, here is what I found.

 

13: kd> !vm 1

 

*** Virtual Memory Usage ***

      Physical Memory:    12580300 (  50321200 Kb)

      Page File: \??\C:\pagefile.sys

        Current:  50331648 Kb  Free Space:  50306732 Kb

        Minimum:  50331648 Kb  Maximum:     50331648 Kb

      Available Pages:     4606721 (  18426884 Kb)

      ResAvail Pages:     12189247 (  48756988 Kb)

      Locked IO Pages:           0 (         0 Kb)

      Free System PTEs:   33460257 ( 133841028 Kb)

      Modified Pages:        20299 (     81196 Kb)

      Modified PF Pages:      6154 (     24616 Kb)

      NonPagedPool 0 Used:   19544 (     78176 Kb)

      NonPagedPool 1 Used:   22308 (     89232 Kb)

      NonPagedPool Usage:    53108 (    212432 Kb)

      NonPagedPool Max:    9408956 (  37635824 Kb)

      PagedPool 0 Usage:    168921 (    675684 Kb)

      PagedPool 1 Usage:   4149241 (  16596964 Kb)

      PagedPool 2 Usage:     17908 (     71632 Kb)

      PagedPool Usage:     4336070 (  17344280 Kb)

      PagedPool Maximum:  33554432 ( 134217728 Kb)

      Session Commit:         3438 (     13752 Kb)

      Shared Commit:          6522 (     26088 Kb)

      Special Pool:              0 (         0 Kb)

      Shared Process:        53597 (    214388 Kb)

      PagedPool Commit:    4336140 (  17344560 Kb)

      Driver Commit:          5691 (     22764 Kb)

      Committed pages:     5565215 (  22260860 Kb)

      Commit limit:       25162749 ( 100650996 Kb)

 

      ********** 48440 commit requests have failed  **********

 

It turns out that this calculation is from a global ULONG array named “nt!MiChargeCommitmentFailures”.  The array has 4 members and they are used to trace the types of commit failures that have taken place. This is done by first calculating the new commit size NewCommitValue = CurrentCommitValue + SystemReservedMemory. Based on this calculation commit errors are tracked in a few different ways, which are listed below with the corresponding member in the array that is incremented.

 

MiChargeCommitmentFailures[0] - If the system failed a commit request and an expansion of the pagefile has failed.

MiChargeCommitmentFailures[1] - If the system failed a commit and we have already reached the maximum pagefile size.

MiChargeCommitmentFailures[2] - If the system failed a commit while the pagefile lock is held.

MiChargeCommitmentFailures[3] - If the system failed a commit and the NewCommitValue is less than or equal to CurrentCommitValue.

 

In order to calculate the count of failures, "!vm" adds up the values stored in each array member of the array. Members 0 and 1 are always counted, member 2 is counted if the OS version is Windows 2003/XP and member 3 is counted if the build version is newer than Windows 2003/XP. 

 

Let's look at the array in the dump I was debugging:

 

13: kd> dc nt!MiChargeCommitmentFailures L4

fffff800`01e45ce0  00000000 0000bd38 00000000 00000000  ....8...........

 

 

Converting this to decimal we find the 48000+ commit failures I was seeing the in output of !VM.

 

13: kd> ?0000bd38

Evaluate expression: 48440 = 00000000`0000bd38

 

Since I now had my answer, “where does the number come from?”, I was left wanting to know a bit more about the overall flow of why a VirtualAlloc fails to commit.

 

When memory is allocated by VirtualAlloc the newly allocated memory is not committed to physical memory. Only when the memory is accessed by a read or write is it backed by physical memory.

 

When this newly allocated memory is accessed for the first time it will need to be backed by commit space. Under normal conditions this is a smooth process, however when the system hits what’s called the commit limit and can’t expand this limit we see commit failures.

 

So how is the commit limit calculated? Let’s say we have a system with 4GB of physical memory and a pagefile that is 6GB in size. To determine the commit limit we add physical memory and the pagefile size together - in this example the commit limit would be 10GB. Since memory manger will not let any user mode allocation consume every last morsel of commit space it keeps a small amount of the commit space for the system to avoid hangs. When the limit is reached the system tries to grow the page file. If there is no more room to grow the pagefile or the pagefile has reached its configured maximum size, the system will try and free some committed memory to make room for more requests. If expansion of the page file or the attempt to free memory do not allow the allocation to complete, the allocation fails and MiChargeCommitmentFailures is incremented.

 

 

To sum it all up, commit limit is RAM + pagefile, commit failures happen when we hit the commit limit and the system is unable to grow the pagefile because it is already at its max.  It’s that simple, well almost.

 

For those that will want to know more about how memory manger works please see the post from Somak: The Memory Shell Game.

 

Randy Monteleone

Comments

  • Anonymous
    April 22, 2013
    Thank you for your sharing.you said, but I have a question, "....and the page file was not full. " .and you also said "If there is no more room to grow the pagefile or the pagefile has reached its configured maximum size" ,doesn't it mean the page file was full? so those two sentences sounds contradictory,how to explain them? [The commitment failure occurred in the past.  At the time the system was debugged there was available memory and pagefile.]