Static Content Hosting pattern

Azure Storage

Deploy static content to a cloud-based storage service that can deliver them directly to the client. This can reduce the need for potentially expensive compute instances.

Context and problem

Web applications typically include some elements of static content. This static content might include HTML pages and other resources such as images and documents that are available to the client, either as part of an HTML page (such as inline images, style sheets, and client-side JavaScript files) or as separate downloads (such as PDF documents).

Although web servers are optimized for dynamic rendering and output caching, they still have to handle requests to download static content. This consumes processing cycles that could often be put to better use.

Solution

In most cloud hosting environments, you can put some of an application's resources and static pages in a storage service. The storage service can serve requests for these resources, reducing load on the compute resources that handle other web requests. The cost for cloud-hosted storage is typically much less than for compute instances.

When hosting some parts of an application in a storage service, the main considerations are related to deployment of the application and to securing resources that aren't intended to be available to anonymous users.

Issues and considerations

Consider the following points when deciding how to implement this pattern:

  • The hosted storage service must expose an HTTP endpoint that users can access to download the static resources. Some storage services also support HTTPS, so it's possible to host resources in storage services that require SSL.

  • For maximum performance and availability, consider using a content delivery network (CDN) to cache the contents of the storage container in multiple datacenters around the world. However, you'll likely have to pay for using the CDN.

  • Storage accounts are often geo-replicated by default to provide resiliency against events that might affect a datacenter. This means that the IP address might change, but the URL will remain the same.

  • When some content is located in a storage account and other content is in a hosted compute instance, it becomes more challenging to deploy and update the application. You might have to perform separate deployments, and version the application and content to manage it more easily—especially when the static content includes script files or UI components. However, if only static resources have to be updated, they can simply be uploaded to the storage account without needing to redeploy the application package.

  • Storage services might not support the use of custom domain names. In this case it's necessary to specify the full URL of the resources in links because they'll be in a different domain from the dynamically generated content containing the links.

  • The storage containers must be configured for public read access, but it's vital to ensure that they aren't configured for public write access to prevent users being able to upload content.

  • Consider using a valet key or token to control access to resources that shouldn't be available anonymously. See the Valet Key pattern for more information.

When to use this pattern

This pattern is useful for:

  • Minimizing the hosting cost for websites and applications that contain some static resources.

  • Minimizing the hosting cost for websites that consist of only static content and resources. Depending on the capabilities of the hosting provider's storage system, it might be possible to entirely host a fully static website in a storage account.

  • Exposing static resources and content for applications running in other hosting environments or on-premises servers.

  • Locating content in more than one geographical area using a content delivery network that caches the contents of the storage account in multiple datacenters around the world.

  • Monitoring costs and bandwidth usage. Using a separate storage account for some or all of the static content allows the costs to be more easily separated from hosting and runtime costs.

This pattern might not be useful in the following situations:

  • The application needs to perform some processing on the static content before delivering it to the client. For example, it might be necessary to add a timestamp to a document.

  • The volume of static content is very small. The overhead of retrieving this content from separate storage can outweigh the cost benefit of separating it out from the compute resource.

Workload design

An architect should evaluate how the Static Content Hosting pattern can be used in their workload's design to address the goals and principles covered in the Azure Well-Architected Framework pillars. For example:

Pillar How this pattern supports pillar goals
Cost Optimization is focused on sustaining and improving your workload's return on investment. Dynamic application hosts are usually more expensive than static hosts because dynamic hosts can run your coded business logic. Using an application platform to deliver static content isn't cost-effective.

- CO:09 Flow costs
- CO:10 Data costs
Performance Efficiency helps your workload efficiently meet demands through optimizations in scaling, data, code. Offloading responsibility to an externalized host helps mitigate congestion and enables you to use your application platform only to deliver business logic.

- PE:07 Code an infrastructure

As with any design decision, consider any tradeoffs against the goals of the other pillars that might be introduced with this pattern.

Example

Azure Storage supports serving static content directly from a storage container. Files are served through anonymous access requests. By default, files have a URL in a subdomain of core.windows.net, such as https://contoso.z4.web.core.windows.net/image.png. You can configure a custom domain name, and use Azure CDN to access the files over HTTPS. For more information, see Static website hosting in Azure Storage.

Delivering static parts of an application directly from a storage service

Static website hosting makes the files available for anonymous access. If you need to control who can access the files, you can store files in Azure blob storage and then generate time and scope limited shared access signatures to restrict access. Access signatures generated should use Microsoft Entra user delegated tokens and be short lived.

The links in the pages delivered to the client must specify the full URL of the resource. If the resource is protected with a valet key, such as a shared access signature, this signature must be included in the URL.

A sample application that demonstrates using external storage for static resources is available on GitHub. This sample uses a configuration file to specify the storage account URL and container that holds the public, static content.

The StaticContentUrlHtmlHelper class in the file StaticContentUrlHtmlHelper.cs exposes a method named StaticContentUrl that generates a URL containing the path to the cloud storage account if the URL passed to it starts with the ASP.NET root path character (~).

public static class StaticContentUrlHtmlHelper
{
  public static string StaticContentUrl(this HtmlHelper helper, string contentPath)
  {
    if (contentPath.StartsWith("~"))
    {
      contentPath = contentPath.Substring(1);
    }

    contentPath = string.Format("{0}/{1}", Settings.StaticContentBaseUrl.TrimEnd('/'),
                                contentPath.TrimStart('/'));

    var url = new UrlHelper(helper.ViewContext.RequestContext);

    return url.Content(contentPath);
  }
}

The file Index.cshtml in the Views\Home folder contains an image element that uses the StaticContentUrl method to create the URL for its src attribute.

<img src="@Html.StaticContentUrl("~/media/orderedList1.png")" alt="Test Image" />

Next steps

  • Valet Key pattern. If the target resources aren't supposed to be available to anonymous users, use this pattern to restrict direct access.
  • Serverless web application on Azure. A reference architecture that uses static website hosting with Azure Functions to implement a serverless web app.