Part 7, add search to an ASP.NET Core MVC app
Note
This isn't the latest version of this article. For the current release, see the .NET 9 version of this article.
Warning
This version of ASP.NET Core is no longer supported. For more information, see the .NET and .NET Core Support Policy. For the current release, see the .NET 9 version of this article.
Important
This information relates to a pre-release product that may be substantially modified before it's commercially released. Microsoft makes no warranties, express or implied, with respect to the information provided here.
For the current release, see the .NET 9 version of this article.
In this section, you add search capability to the Index
action method that lets you search movies by genre or name.
Update the Index
method found inside Controllers/MoviesController.cs
with the following code:
public async Task<IActionResult> Index(string searchString)
{
if (_context.Movie == null)
{
return Problem("Entity set 'MvcMovieContext.Movie' is null.");
}
var movies = from m in _context.Movie
select m;
if (!String.IsNullOrEmpty(searchString))
{
movies = movies.Where(s => s.Title!.ToUpper().Contains(searchString.ToUpper()));
}
return View(await movies.ToListAsync());
}
The following line in the Index
action method creates a LINQ query to select the movies:
var movies = from m in _context.Movie
select m;
The query is only defined at this point, it has not been run against the database.
If the searchString
parameter contains a string, the movies query is modified to filter on the value of the search string:
if (!String.IsNullOrEmpty(searchString))
{
movies = movies.Where(s => s.Title!.ToUpper().Contains(searchString.ToUpper()));
}
The s => s.Title!.ToUpper().Contains(searchString.ToUpper())
code above is a Lambda Expression. Lambdas are used in method-based LINQ queries as arguments to standard query operator methods such as the Where method or Contains
(used in the code above). LINQ queries are not executed when they're defined or when they're modified by calling a method such as Where
, Contains
, or OrderBy
. Rather, query execution is deferred. That means that the evaluation of an expression is delayed until its realized value is actually iterated over or the ToListAsync
method is called. For more information about deferred query execution, see Query Execution.
Note
The Contains method is run on the database, not in the C# code. The case sensitivity on the query depends on the database and the collation. On SQL Server, Contains
maps to SQL LIKE, which is case insensitive. SQLite with the default collation is a mixture of case sensitive and case INsensitive, depending on the query. For information on making case insensitive SQLite queries, see the following:
Navigate to /Movies/Index
. Append a query string such as ?searchString=Ghost
to the URL. The filtered movies are displayed.
If you change the signature of the Index
method to have a parameter named id
, the id
parameter will match the optional {id}
placeholder for the default routes set in Program.cs
.
app.MapControllerRoute(
name: "default",
pattern: "{controller=Home}/{action=Index}/{id?}");
Change the parameter to id
and change all occurrences of searchString
to id
.
The previous Index
method:
public async Task<IActionResult> Index(string searchString)
{
if (_context.Movie == null)
{
return Problem("Entity set 'MvcMovieContext.Movie' is null.");
}
var movies = from m in _context.Movie
select m;
if (!String.IsNullOrEmpty(searchString))
{
movies = movies.Where(s => s.Title!.ToUpper().Contains(searchString.ToUpper()));
}
return View(await movies.ToListAsync());
}
The updated Index
method with id
parameter:
public async Task<IActionResult> Index(string id)
{
if (_context.Movie == null)
{
return Problem("Entity set 'MvcMovieContext.Movie' is null.");
}
var movies = from m in _context.Movie
select m;
if (!String.IsNullOrEmpty(id))
{
movies = movies.Where(s => s.Title!.ToUpper().Contains(id.ToUpper()));
}
return View(await movies.ToListAsync());
}
You can now pass the search title as route data (a URL segment) instead of as a query string value.
However, you can't expect users to modify the URL every time they want to search for a movie. So now you'll add UI elements to help them filter movies. If you changed the signature of the Index
method to test how to pass the route-bound ID
parameter, change it back so that it takes a parameter named searchString
:
public async Task<IActionResult> Index(string searchString)
{
if (_context.Movie == null)
{
return Problem("Entity set 'MvcMovieContext.Movie' is null.");
}
var movies = from m in _context.Movie
select m;
if (!String.IsNullOrEmpty(searchString))
{
movies = movies.Where(s => s.Title!.ToUpper().Contains(searchString.ToUpper()));
}
return View(await movies.ToListAsync());
}
Open the Views/Movies/Index.cshtml
file, and add the <form>
markup highlighted below:
@model IEnumerable<MvcMovie.Models.Movie>
@{
ViewData["Title"] = "Index";
}
<h1>Index</h1>
<p>
<a asp-action="Create">Create New</a>
</p>
<form asp-controller="Movies" asp-action="Index">
<p>
<label>Title: <input type="text" name="SearchString" /></label>
<input type="submit" value="Filter" />
</p>
</form>
<table class="table">
The HTML <form>
tag uses the Form Tag Helper, so when you submit the form, the filter string is posted to the Index
action of the movies controller. Save your changes and then test the filter.
There's no [HttpPost]
overload of the Index
method as you might expect. You don't need it, because the method isn't changing the state of the app, just filtering data.
You could add the following [HttpPost] Index
method.
[HttpPost]
public string Index(string searchString, bool notUsed)
{
return "From [HttpPost]Index: filter on " + searchString;
}
The notUsed
parameter is used to create an overload for the Index
method. We'll talk about that later in the tutorial.
If you add this method, the action invoker would match the [HttpPost] Index
method, and the [HttpPost] Index
method would run as shown in the image below.
However, even if you add this [HttpPost]
version of the Index
method, there's a limitation in how this has all been implemented. Imagine that you want to bookmark a particular search or you want to send a link to friends that they can click in order to see the same filtered list of movies. Notice that the URL for the HTTP POST request is the same as the URL for the GET request (localhost:{PORT}/Movies/Index) -- there's no search information in the URL. The search string information is sent to the server as a form field value. You can verify that with the browser Developer tools or the excellent Fiddler tool.
The following image shows the Chrome browser Developer tools with the Network and Headers tabs selected:
The Network and Payload tabs are selected to view form data:
You can see the search parameter and XSRF token in the request body. Note, as mentioned in the previous tutorial, the Form Tag Helper generates an XSRF antiforgery token. We're not modifying data, so we don't need to validate the token in the controller method.
Because the search parameter is in the request body and not the URL, you can't capture that search information to bookmark or share with others. Fix this by specifying the request should be HTTP GET
in the form
tag found in the Views/Movies/Index.cshtml
file.
@model IEnumerable<MvcMovie.Models.Movie>
@{
ViewData["Title"] = "Index";
}
<h1>Index</h1>
<p>
<a asp-action="Create">Create New</a>
</p>
<form asp-controller="Movies" asp-action="Index" method="get">
<p>
<label>Title: <input type="text" name="SearchString" /></label>
<input type="submit" value="Filter" />
</p>
</form>
<table class="table">
Now when you submit a search, the URL contains the search query string. Searching will also go to the HttpGet Index
action method, even if you have a HttpPost Index
method.
Add Search by genre
Add the following MovieGenreViewModel
class to the Models folder:
using Microsoft.AspNetCore.Mvc.Rendering;
using System.Collections.Generic;
namespace MvcMovie.Models;
public class MovieGenreViewModel
{
public List<Movie>? Movies { get; set; }
public SelectList? Genres { get; set; }
public string? MovieGenre { get; set; }
public string? SearchString { get; set; }
}
The movie-genre view model will contain:
- A list of movies.
- A
SelectList
containing the list of genres. This allows the user to select a genre from the list. MovieGenre
, which contains the selected genre.SearchString
, which contains the text users enter in the search text box.
Replace the Index
method in MoviesController.cs
with the following code:
// GET: Movies
public async Task<IActionResult> Index(string movieGenre, string searchString)
{
if (_context.Movie == null)
{
return Problem("Entity set 'MvcMovieContext.Movie' is null.");
}
// Use LINQ to get list of genres.
IQueryable<string> genreQuery = from m in _context.Movie
orderby m.Genre
select m.Genre;
var movies = from m in _context.Movie
select m;
if (!string.IsNullOrEmpty(searchString))
{
movies = movies.Where(s => s.Title!.ToUpper().Contains(searchString.ToUpper()));
}
if (!string.IsNullOrEmpty(movieGenre))
{
movies = movies.Where(x => x.Genre == movieGenre);
}
var movieGenreVM = new MovieGenreViewModel
{
Genres = new SelectList(await genreQuery.Distinct().ToListAsync()),
Movies = await movies.ToListAsync()
};
return View(movieGenreVM);
}
The following code is a LINQ
query that retrieves all the genres from the database.
// Use LINQ to get list of genres.
IQueryable<string> genreQuery = from m in _context.Movie
orderby m.Genre
select m.Genre;
The SelectList
of genres is created by projecting the distinct genres (we don't want our select list to have duplicate genres).
When the user searches for the item, the search value is retained in the search box.
Add search by genre to the Index view
Update Index.cshtml
found in Views/Movies/ as follows:
@model MvcMovie.Models.MovieGenreViewModel
@{
ViewData["Title"] = "Index";
}
<h1>Index</h1>
<p>
<a asp-action="Create">Create New</a>
</p>
<form asp-controller="Movies" asp-action="Index" method="get">
<p>
<select asp-for="MovieGenre" asp-items="Model.Genres">
<option value="">All</option>
</select>
<label>Title: <input type="text" asp-for="SearchString" /></label>
<input type="submit" value="Filter" />
</p>
</form>
<table class="table">
<thead>
<tr>
<th>
@Html.DisplayNameFor(model => model.Movies![0].Title)
</th>
<th>
@Html.DisplayNameFor(model => model.Movies![0].ReleaseDate)
</th>
<th>
@Html.DisplayNameFor(model => model.Movies![0].Genre)
</th>
<th>
@Html.DisplayNameFor(model => model.Movies![0].Price)
</th>
<th></th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
@foreach (var item in Model.Movies!)
{
<tr>
<td>
@Html.DisplayFor(modelItem => item.Title)
</td>
<td>
@Html.DisplayFor(modelItem => item.ReleaseDate)
</td>
<td>
@Html.DisplayFor(modelItem => item.Genre)
</td>
<td>
@Html.DisplayFor(modelItem => item.Price)
</td>
<td>
<a asp-action="Edit" asp-route-id="@item.Id">Edit</a> |
<a asp-action="Details" asp-route-id="@item.Id">Details</a> |
<a asp-action="Delete" asp-route-id="@item.Id">Delete</a>
</td>
</tr>
}
</tbody>
</table>
Examine the lambda expression used in the following HTML Helper:
@Html.DisplayNameFor(model => model.Movies![0].Title)
In the preceding code, the DisplayNameFor
HTML Helper inspects the Title
property referenced in the lambda expression to determine the display name. Since the lambda expression is inspected rather than evaluated, you don't receive an access violation when model
, model.Movies
, or model.Movies[0]
are null
or empty. When the lambda expression is evaluated (for example, @Html.DisplayFor(modelItem => item.Title)
), the model's property values are evaluated. The !
after model.Movies
is the null-forgiving operator, which is used to declare that Movies
isn't null.
Test the app by searching by genre, by movie title, and by both:
In this section, you add search capability to the Index
action method that lets you search movies by genre or name.
Update the Index
method found inside Controllers/MoviesController.cs
with the following code:
public async Task<IActionResult> Index(string searchString)
{
if (_context.Movie == null)
{
return Problem("Entity set 'MvcMovieContext.Movie' is null.");
}
var movies = from m in _context.Movie
select m;
if (!String.IsNullOrEmpty(searchString))
{
movies = movies.Where(s => s.Title!.ToUpper().Contains(searchString.ToUpper()));
}
return View(await movies.ToListAsync());
}
The following line in the Index
action method creates a LINQ query to select the movies:
var movies = from m in _context.Movie
select m;
The query is only defined at this point, it has not been run against the database.
If the searchString
parameter contains a string, the movies query is modified to filter on the value of the search string:
if (!String.IsNullOrEmpty(searchString))
{
movies = movies.Where(s => s.Title!.ToUpper().Contains(searchString.ToUpper()));
}
The s => s.Title!.ToUpper().Contains(searchString.ToUpper())
code above is a Lambda Expression. Lambdas are used in method-based LINQ queries as arguments to standard query operator methods such as the Where method or Contains
(used in the code above). LINQ queries are not executed when they're defined or when they're modified by calling a method such as Where
, Contains
, or OrderBy
. Rather, query execution is deferred. That means that the evaluation of an expression is delayed until its realized value is actually iterated over or the ToListAsync
method is called. For more information about deferred query execution, see Query Execution.
Note
The Contains method is run on the database, not in the C# code. The case sensitivity on the query depends on the database and the collation. On SQL Server, Contains
maps to SQL LIKE, which is case insensitive. SQLite with the default collation is a mixture of case sensitive and case INsensitive, depending on the query. For information on making case insensitive SQLite queries, see the following:
Navigate to /Movies/Index
. Append a query string such as ?searchString=Ghost
to the URL. The filtered movies are displayed.
If you change the signature of the Index
method to have a parameter named id
, the id
parameter will match the optional {id}
placeholder for the default routes set in Program.cs
.
app.MapControllerRoute(
name: "default",
pattern: "{controller=Home}/{action=Index}/{id?}");
Change the parameter to id
and change all occurrences of searchString
to id
.
The previous Index
method:
public async Task<IActionResult> Index(string searchString)
{
if (_context.Movie == null)
{
return Problem("Entity set 'MvcMovieContext.Movie' is null.");
}
var movies = from m in _context.Movie
select m;
if (!String.IsNullOrEmpty(searchString))
{
movies = movies.Where(s => s.Title!.ToUpper().Contains(searchString.ToUpper()));
}
return View(await movies.ToListAsync());
}
The updated Index
method with id
parameter:
public async Task<IActionResult> Index(string id)
{
if (_context.Movie == null)
{
return Problem("Entity set 'MvcMovieContext.Movie' is null.");
}
var movies = from m in _context.Movie
select m;
if (!String.IsNullOrEmpty(id))
{
movies = movies.Where(s => s.Title!.ToUpper().Contains(id.ToUpper()));
}
return View(await movies.ToListAsync());
}
You can now pass the search title as route data (a URL segment) instead of as a query string value.
However, you can't expect users to modify the URL every time they want to search for a movie. So now you'll add UI elements to help them filter movies. If you changed the signature of the Index
method to test how to pass the route-bound ID
parameter, change it back so that it takes a parameter named searchString
:
public async Task<IActionResult> Index(string searchString)
{
if (_context.Movie == null)
{
return Problem("Entity set 'MvcMovieContext.Movie' is null.");
}
var movies = from m in _context.Movie
select m;
if (!String.IsNullOrEmpty(searchString))
{
movies = movies.Where(s => s.Title!.ToUpper().Contains(searchString.ToUpper()));
}
return View(await movies.ToListAsync());
}
Open the Views/Movies/Index.cshtml
file, and add the <form>
markup highlighted below:
@model IEnumerable<MvcMovie.Models.Movie>
@{
ViewData["Title"] = "Index";
}
<h1>Index</h1>
<p>
<a asp-action="Create">Create New</a>
</p>
<form asp-controller="Movies" asp-action="Index">
<p>
<label>Title: <input type="text" name="SearchString" /></label>
<input type="submit" value="Filter" />
</p>
</form>
<table class="table">
The HTML <form>
tag uses the Form Tag Helper, so when you submit the form, the filter string is posted to the Index
action of the movies controller. Save your changes and then test the filter.
There's no [HttpPost]
overload of the Index
method as you might expect. You don't need it, because the method isn't changing the state of the app, just filtering data.
You could add the following [HttpPost] Index
method.
[HttpPost]
public string Index(string searchString, bool notUsed)
{
return "From [HttpPost]Index: filter on " + searchString;
}
The notUsed
parameter is used to create an overload for the Index
method. We'll talk about that later in the tutorial.
If you add this method, the action invoker would match the [HttpPost] Index
method, and the [HttpPost] Index
method would run as shown in the image below.
However, even if you add this [HttpPost]
version of the Index
method, there's a limitation in how this has all been implemented. Imagine that you want to bookmark a particular search or you want to send a link to friends that they can click in order to see the same filtered list of movies. Notice that the URL for the HTTP POST request is the same as the URL for the GET request (localhost:{PORT}/Movies/Index) -- there's no search information in the URL. The search string information is sent to the server as a form field value. You can verify that with the browser Developer tools or the excellent Fiddler tool. The image below shows the Chrome browser Developer tools:
You can see the search parameter and XSRF token in the request body. Note, as mentioned in the previous tutorial, the Form Tag Helper generates an XSRF antiforgery token. We're not modifying data, so we don't need to validate the token in the controller method.
Because the search parameter is in the request body and not the URL, you can't capture that search information to bookmark or share with others. Fix this by specifying the request should be HTTP GET
found in the Views/Movies/Index.cshtml
file.
@model IEnumerable<MvcMovie.Models.Movie>
@{
ViewData["Title"] = "Index";
}
<h1>Index</h1>
<p>
<a asp-action="Create">Create New</a>
</p>
<form asp-controller="Movies" asp-action="Index" method="get">
<p>
<label>Title: <input type="text" name="SearchString" /></label>
<input type="submit" value="Filter" />
</p>
</form>
<table class="table">
Now when you submit a search, the URL contains the search query string. Searching will also go to the HttpGet Index
action method, even if you have a HttpPost Index
method.
The following markup shows the change to the form
tag:
<form asp-controller="Movies" asp-action="Index" method="get">
Add Search by genre
Add the following MovieGenreViewModel
class to the Models folder:
using Microsoft.AspNetCore.Mvc.Rendering;
using System.Collections.Generic;
namespace MvcMovie.Models;
public class MovieGenreViewModel
{
public List<Movie>? Movies { get; set; }
public SelectList? Genres { get; set; }
public string? MovieGenre { get; set; }
public string? SearchString { get; set; }
}
The movie-genre view model will contain:
- A list of movies.
- A
SelectList
containing the list of genres. This allows the user to select a genre from the list. MovieGenre
, which contains the selected genre.SearchString
, which contains the text users enter in the search text box.
Replace the Index
method in MoviesController.cs
with the following code:
// GET: Movies
public async Task<IActionResult> Index(string movieGenre, string searchString)
{
if (_context.Movie == null)
{
return Problem("Entity set 'MvcMovieContext.Movie' is null.");
}
// Use LINQ to get list of genres.
IQueryable<string> genreQuery = from m in _context.Movie
orderby m.Genre
select m.Genre;
var movies = from m in _context.Movie
select m;
if (!string.IsNullOrEmpty(searchString))
{
movies = movies.Where(s => s.Title!.ToUpper().Contains(searchString.ToUpper()));
}
if (!string.IsNullOrEmpty(movieGenre))
{
movies = movies.Where(x => x.Genre == movieGenre);
}
var movieGenreVM = new MovieGenreViewModel
{
Genres = new SelectList(await genreQuery.Distinct().ToListAsync()),
Movies = await movies.ToListAsync()
};
return View(movieGenreVM);
}
The following code is a LINQ
query that retrieves all the genres from the database.
// Use LINQ to get list of genres.
IQueryable<string> genreQuery = from m in _context.Movie
orderby m.Genre
select m.Genre;
The SelectList
of genres is created by projecting the distinct genres (we don't want our select list to have duplicate genres).
When the user searches for the item, the search value is retained in the search box.
Add search by genre to the Index view
Update Index.cshtml
found in Views/Movies/ as follows:
@model MvcMovie.Models.MovieGenreViewModel
@{
ViewData["Title"] = "Index";
}
<h1>Index</h1>
<p>
<a asp-action="Create">Create New</a>
</p>
<form asp-controller="Movies" asp-action="Index" method="get">
<p>
<select asp-for="MovieGenre" asp-items="Model.Genres">
<option value="">All</option>
</select>
<label>Title: <input type="text" asp-for="SearchString" /></label>
<input type="submit" value="Filter" />
</p>
</form>
<table class="table">
<thead>
<tr>
<th>
@Html.DisplayNameFor(model => model.Movies![0].Title)
</th>
<th>
@Html.DisplayNameFor(model => model.Movies![0].ReleaseDate)
</th>
<th>
@Html.DisplayNameFor(model => model.Movies![0].Genre)
</th>
<th>
@Html.DisplayNameFor(model => model.Movies![0].Price)
</th>
<th></th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
@foreach (var item in Model.Movies!)
{
<tr>
<td>
@Html.DisplayFor(modelItem => item.Title)
</td>
<td>
@Html.DisplayFor(modelItem => item.ReleaseDate)
</td>
<td>
@Html.DisplayFor(modelItem => item.Genre)
</td>
<td>
@Html.DisplayFor(modelItem => item.Price)
</td>
<td>
<a asp-action="Edit" asp-route-id="@item.Id">Edit</a> |
<a asp-action="Details" asp-route-id="@item.Id">Details</a> |
<a asp-action="Delete" asp-route-id="@item.Id">Delete</a>
</td>
</tr>
}
</tbody>
</table>
Examine the lambda expression used in the following HTML Helper:
@Html.DisplayNameFor(model => model.Movies![0].Title)
In the preceding code, the DisplayNameFor
HTML Helper inspects the Title
property referenced in the lambda expression to determine the display name. Since the lambda expression is inspected rather than evaluated, you don't receive an access violation when model
, model.Movies
, or model.Movies[0]
are null
or empty. When the lambda expression is evaluated (for example, @Html.DisplayFor(modelItem => item.Title)
), the model's property values are evaluated. The !
after model.Movies
is the null-forgiving operator, which is used to declare that Movies
isn't null.
Test the app by searching by genre, by movie title, and by both:
In this section, you add search capability to the Index
action method that lets you search movies by genre or name.
Update the Index
method found inside Controllers/MoviesController.cs
with the following code:
public async Task<IActionResult> Index(string searchString)
{
if (_context.Movie == null)
{
return Problem("Entity set 'MvcMovieContext.Movie' is null.");
}
var movies = from m in _context.Movie
select m;
if (!String.IsNullOrEmpty(searchString))
{
movies = movies.Where(s => s.Title!.ToUpper().Contains(searchString.ToUpper()));
}
return View(await movies.ToListAsync());
}
The following line in the Index
action method creates a LINQ query to select the movies:
var movies = from m in _context.Movie
select m;
The query is only defined at this point, it has not been run against the database.
If the searchString
parameter contains a string, the movies query is modified to filter on the value of the search string:
if (!String.IsNullOrEmpty(searchString))
{
movies = movies.Where(s => s.Title!.ToUpper().Contains(searchString.ToUpper()));
}
The s => s.Title!.ToUpper().Contains(searchString.ToUpper())
code above is a Lambda Expression. Lambdas are used in method-based LINQ queries as arguments to standard query operator methods such as the Where method or Contains
(used in the code above). LINQ queries are not executed when they're defined or when they're modified by calling a method such as Where
, Contains
, or OrderBy
. Rather, query execution is deferred. That means that the evaluation of an expression is delayed until its realized value is actually iterated over or the ToListAsync
method is called. For more information about deferred query execution, see Query Execution.
Note
The Contains method is run on the database, not in the C# code. The case sensitivity on the query depends on the database and the collation. On SQL Server, Contains
maps to SQL LIKE, which is case insensitive. SQLite with the default collation is a mixture of case sensitive and case INsensitive, depending on the query. For information on making case insensitive SQLite queries, see the following:
Navigate to /Movies/Index
. Append a query string such as ?searchString=Ghost
to the URL. The filtered movies are displayed.
If you change the signature of the Index
method to have a parameter named id
, the id
parameter will match the optional {id}
placeholder for the default routes set in Program.cs
.
app.MapControllerRoute(
name: "default",
pattern: "{controller=Home}/{action=Index}/{id?}");
Change the parameter to id
and change all occurrences of searchString
to id
.
The previous Index
method:
public async Task<IActionResult> Index(string searchString)
{
if (_context.Movie == null)
{
return Problem("Entity set 'MvcMovieContext.Movie' is null.");
}
var movies = from m in _context.Movie
select m;
if (!String.IsNullOrEmpty(searchString))
{
movies = movies.Where(s => s.Title!.ToUpper().Contains(searchString.ToUpper()));
}
return View(await movies.ToListAsync());
}
The updated Index
method with id
parameter:
public async Task<IActionResult> Index(string id)
{
if (_context.Movie == null)
{
return Problem("Entity set 'MvcMovieContext.Movie' is null.");
}
var movies = from m in _context.Movie
select m;
if (!String.IsNullOrEmpty(id))
{
movies = movies.Where(s => s.Title!.ToUpper().Contains(id.ToUpper()));
}
return View(await movies.ToListAsync());
}
You can now pass the search title as route data (a URL segment) instead of as a query string value.
However, you can't expect users to modify the URL every time they want to search for a movie. So now you'll add UI elements to help them filter movies. If you changed the signature of the Index
method to test how to pass the route-bound ID
parameter, change it back so that it takes a parameter named searchString
:
public async Task<IActionResult> Index(string searchString)
{
if (_context.Movie == null)
{
return Problem("Entity set 'MvcMovieContext.Movie' is null.");
}
var movies = from m in _context.Movie
select m;
if (!String.IsNullOrEmpty(searchString))
{
movies = movies.Where(s => s.Title!.ToUpper().Contains(searchString.ToUpper()));
}
return View(await movies.ToListAsync());
}
Open the Views/Movies/Index.cshtml
file, and add the <form>
markup highlighted below:
@model IEnumerable<MvcMovie.Models.Movie>
@{
ViewData["Title"] = "Index";
}
<h1>Index</h1>
<p>
<a asp-action="Create">Create New</a>
</p>
<form asp-controller="Movies" asp-action="Index">
<p>
<label>Title: <input type="text" name="SearchString" /></label>
<input type="submit" value="Filter" />
</p>
</form>
<table class="table">
The HTML <form>
tag uses the Form Tag Helper, so when you submit the form, the filter string is posted to the Index
action of the movies controller. Save your changes and then test the filter.
There's no [HttpPost]
overload of the Index
method as you might expect. You don't need it, because the method isn't changing the state of the app, just filtering data.
You could add the following [HttpPost] Index
method.
[HttpPost]
public string Index(string searchString, bool notUsed)
{
return "From [HttpPost]Index: filter on " + searchString;
}
The notUsed
parameter is used to create an overload for the Index
method. We'll talk about that later in the tutorial.
If you add this method, the action invoker would match the [HttpPost] Index
method, and the [HttpPost] Index
method would run as shown in the image below.
However, even if you add this [HttpPost]
version of the Index
method, there's a limitation in how this has all been implemented. Imagine that you want to bookmark a particular search or you want to send a link to friends that they can click in order to see the same filtered list of movies. Notice that the URL for the HTTP POST request is the same as the URL for the GET request (localhost:{PORT}/Movies/Index) -- there's no search information in the URL. The search string information is sent to the server as a form field value. You can verify that with the browser Developer tools or the excellent Fiddler tool. The image below shows the Chrome browser Developer tools:
You can see the search parameter and XSRF token in the request body. Note, as mentioned in the previous tutorial, the Form Tag Helper generates an XSRF antiforgery token. We're not modifying data, so we don't need to validate the token in the controller method.
Because the search parameter is in the request body and not the URL, you can't capture that search information to bookmark or share with others. Fix this by specifying the request should be HTTP GET
found in the Views/Movies/Index.cshtml
file.
@model IEnumerable<MvcMovie.Models.Movie>
@{
ViewData["Title"] = "Index";
}
<h1>Index</h1>
<p>
<a asp-action="Create">Create New</a>
</p>
<form asp-controller="Movies" asp-action="Index" method="get">
<p>
<label>Title: <input type="text" name="SearchString" /></label>
<input type="submit" value="Filter" />
</p>
</form>
<table class="table">
Now when you submit a search, the URL contains the search query string. Searching will also go to the HttpGet Index
action method, even if you have a HttpPost Index
method.
The following markup shows the change to the form
tag:
<form asp-controller="Movies" asp-action="Index" method="get">
Add Search by genre
Add the following MovieGenreViewModel
class to the Models folder:
using Microsoft.AspNetCore.Mvc.Rendering;
using System.Collections.Generic;
namespace MvcMovie.Models;
public class MovieGenreViewModel
{
public List<Movie>? Movies { get; set; }
public SelectList? Genres { get; set; }
public string? MovieGenre { get; set; }
public string? SearchString { get; set; }
}
The movie-genre view model will contain:
- A list of movies.
- A
SelectList
containing the list of genres. This allows the user to select a genre from the list. MovieGenre
, which contains the selected genre.SearchString
, which contains the text users enter in the search text box.
Replace the Index
method in MoviesController.cs
with the following code:
// GET: Movies
public async Task<IActionResult> Index(string movieGenre, string searchString)
{
if (_context.Movie == null)
{
return Problem("Entity set 'MvcMovieContext.Movie' is null.");
}
// Use LINQ to get list of genres.
IQueryable<string> genreQuery = from m in _context.Movie
orderby m.Genre
select m.Genre;
var movies = from m in _context.Movie
select m;
if (!string.IsNullOrEmpty(searchString))
{
movies = movies.Where(s => s.Title!.ToUpper().Contains(searchString.ToUpper()));
}
if (!string.IsNullOrEmpty(movieGenre))
{
movies = movies.Where(x => x.Genre == movieGenre);
}
var movieGenreVM = new MovieGenreViewModel
{
Genres = new SelectList(await genreQuery.Distinct().ToListAsync()),
Movies = await movies.ToListAsync()
};
return View(movieGenreVM);
}
The following code is a LINQ
query that retrieves all the genres from the database.
// Use LINQ to get list of genres.
IQueryable<string> genreQuery = from m in _context.Movie
orderby m.Genre
select m.Genre;
The SelectList
of genres is created by projecting the distinct genres (we don't want our select list to have duplicate genres).
When the user searches for the item, the search value is retained in the search box.
Add search by genre to the Index view
Update Index.cshtml
found in Views/Movies/ as follows:
@model MvcMovie.Models.MovieGenreViewModel
@{
ViewData["Title"] = "Index";
}
<h1>Index</h1>
<p>
<a asp-action="Create">Create New</a>
</p>
<form asp-controller="Movies" asp-action="Index" method="get">
<p>
<select asp-for="MovieGenre" asp-items="Model.Genres">
<option value="">All</option>
</select>
<label>Title: <input type="text" asp-for="SearchString" /></label>
<input type="submit" value="Filter" />
</p>
</form>
<table class="table">
<thead>
<tr>
<th>
@Html.DisplayNameFor(model => model.Movies![0].Title)
</th>
<th>
@Html.DisplayNameFor(model => model.Movies![0].ReleaseDate)
</th>
<th>
@Html.DisplayNameFor(model => model.Movies![0].Genre)
</th>
<th>
@Html.DisplayNameFor(model => model.Movies![0].Price)
</th>
<th></th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
@foreach (var item in Model.Movies!)
{
<tr>
<td>
@Html.DisplayFor(modelItem => item.Title)
</td>
<td>
@Html.DisplayFor(modelItem => item.ReleaseDate)
</td>
<td>
@Html.DisplayFor(modelItem => item.Genre)
</td>
<td>
@Html.DisplayFor(modelItem => item.Price)
</td>
<td>
<a asp-action="Edit" asp-route-id="@item.Id">Edit</a> |
<a asp-action="Details" asp-route-id="@item.Id">Details</a> |
<a asp-action="Delete" asp-route-id="@item.Id">Delete</a>
</td>
</tr>
}
</tbody>
</table>
Examine the lambda expression used in the following HTML Helper:
@Html.DisplayNameFor(model => model.Movies![0].Title)
In the preceding code, the DisplayNameFor
HTML Helper inspects the Title
property referenced in the lambda expression to determine the display name. Since the lambda expression is inspected rather than evaluated, you don't receive an access violation when model
, model.Movies
, or model.Movies[0]
are null
or empty. When the lambda expression is evaluated (for example, @Html.DisplayFor(modelItem => item.Title)
), the model's property values are evaluated. The !
after model.Movies
is the null-forgiving operator, which is used to declare that Movies
isn't null.
Test the app by searching by genre, by movie title, and by both:
In this section, you add search capability to the Index
action method that lets you search movies by genre or name.
Update the Index
method found inside Controllers/MoviesController.cs
with the following code:
public async Task<IActionResult> Index(string searchString)
{
var movies = from m in _context.Movie
select m;
if (!String.IsNullOrEmpty(searchString))
{
movies = movies.Where(s => s.Title!.Contains(searchString));
}
return View(await movies.ToListAsync());
}
The first line of the Index
action method creates a LINQ query to select the movies:
var movies = from m in _context.Movie
select m;
The query is only defined at this point, it has not been run against the database.
If the searchString
parameter contains a string, the movies query is modified to filter on the value of the search string:
if (!String.IsNullOrEmpty(searchString))
{
movies = movies.Where(s => s.Title!.Contains(searchString));
}
The s => s.Title!.Contains(searchString)
code above is a Lambda Expression. Lambdas are used in method-based LINQ queries as arguments to standard query operator methods such as the Where method or Contains
(used in the code above). LINQ queries are not executed when they're defined or when they're modified by calling a method such as Where
, Contains
, or OrderBy
. Rather, query execution is deferred. That means that the evaluation of an expression is delayed until its realized value is actually iterated over or the ToListAsync
method is called. For more information about deferred query execution, see Query Execution.
Note: The Contains method is run on the database, not in the c# code shown above. The case sensitivity on the query depends on the database and the collation. On SQL Server, Contains
maps to SQL LIKE, which is case insensitive. In SQLite, with the default collation, it's case sensitive.
Navigate to /Movies/Index
. Append a query string such as ?searchString=Ghost
to the URL. The filtered movies are displayed.
If you change the signature of the Index
method to have a parameter named id
, the id
parameter will match the optional {id}
placeholder for the default routes set in Program.cs
.
app.MapControllerRoute(
name: "default",
pattern: "{controller=Home}/{action=Index}/{id?}");
Change the parameter to id
and change all occurrences of searchString
to id
.
The previous Index
method:
public async Task<IActionResult> Index(string searchString)
{
var movies = from m in _context.Movie
select m;
if (!String.IsNullOrEmpty(searchString))
{
movies = movies.Where(s => s.Title!.Contains(searchString));
}
return View(await movies.ToListAsync());
}
The updated Index
method with id
parameter:
public async Task<IActionResult> Index(string id)
{
var movies = from m in _context.Movie
select m;
if (!String.IsNullOrEmpty(id))
{
movies = movies.Where(s => s.Title!.Contains(id));
}
return View(await movies.ToListAsync());
}
You can now pass the search title as route data (a URL segment) instead of as a query string value.
However, you can't expect users to modify the URL every time they want to search for a movie. So now you'll add UI elements to help them filter movies. If you changed the signature of the Index
method to test how to pass the route-bound ID
parameter, change it back so that it takes a parameter named searchString
:
public async Task<IActionResult> Index(string searchString)
{
var movies = from m in _context.Movie
select m;
if (!String.IsNullOrEmpty(searchString))
{
movies = movies.Where(s => s.Title!.Contains(searchString));
}
return View(await movies.ToListAsync());
}
Open the Views/Movies/Index.cshtml
file, and add the <form>
markup highlighted below:
@model IEnumerable<MvcMovie.Models.Movie>
@{
ViewData["Title"] = "Index";
}
<h2>Index</h2>
<p>
<a asp-action="Create">Create New</a>
</p>
<form asp-controller="Movies" asp-action="Index">
<p>
<label>Title: <input type="text" name="SearchString" /></label>
<input type="submit" value="Filter" />
</p>
</form>
The HTML <form>
tag uses the Form Tag Helper, so when you submit the form, the filter string is posted to the Index
action of the movies controller. Save your changes and then test the filter.
There's no [HttpPost]
overload of the Index
method as you might expect. You don't need it, because the method isn't changing the state of the app, just filtering data.
You could add the following [HttpPost] Index
method.
[HttpPost]
public string Index(string searchString, bool notUsed)
{
return "From [HttpPost]Index: filter on " + searchString;
}
The notUsed
parameter is used to create an overload for the Index
method. We'll talk about that later in the tutorial.
If you add this method, the action invoker would match the [HttpPost] Index
method, and the [HttpPost] Index
method would run as shown in the image below.
However, even if you add this [HttpPost]
version of the Index
method, there's a limitation in how this has all been implemented. Imagine that you want to bookmark a particular search or you want to send a link to friends that they can click in order to see the same filtered list of movies. Notice that the URL for the HTTP POST request is the same as the URL for the GET request (localhost:{PORT}/Movies/Index) -- there's no search information in the URL. The search string information is sent to the server as a form field value. You can verify that with the browser Developer tools or the excellent Fiddler tool. The image below shows the Chrome browser Developer tools:
You can see the search parameter and XSRF token in the request body. Note, as mentioned in the previous tutorial, the Form Tag Helper generates an XSRF antiforgery token. We're not modifying data, so we don't need to validate the token in the controller method.
Because the search parameter is in the request body and not the URL, you can't capture that search information to bookmark or share with others. Fix this by specifying the request should be HTTP GET
found in the Views/Movies/Index.cshtml
file.
@model IEnumerable<MvcMovie.Models.Movie>
@{
ViewData["Title"] = "Index";
}
<h1>Index</h1>
<p>
<a asp-action="Create">Create New</a>
</p>
<form asp-controller="Movies" asp-action="Index" method="get">
<p>
<label>Title: <input type="text" name="SearchString" /></label>
<input type="submit" value="Filter" />
</p>
</form>
<table class="table">
Now when you submit a search, the URL contains the search query string. Searching will also go to the HttpGet Index
action method, even if you have a HttpPost Index
method.
The following markup shows the change to the form
tag:
<form asp-controller="Movies" asp-action="Index" method="get">
Add Search by genre
Add the following MovieGenreViewModel
class to the Models folder:
using Microsoft.AspNetCore.Mvc.Rendering;
using System.Collections.Generic;
namespace MvcMovie.Models
{
public class MovieGenreViewModel
{
public List<Movie>? Movies { get; set; }
public SelectList? Genres { get; set; }
public string? MovieGenre { get; set; }
public string? SearchString { get; set; }
}
}
The movie-genre view model will contain:
- A list of movies.
- A
SelectList
containing the list of genres. This allows the user to select a genre from the list. MovieGenre
, which contains the selected genre.SearchString
, which contains the text users enter in the search text box.
Replace the Index
method in MoviesController.cs
with the following code:
// GET: Movies
public async Task<IActionResult> Index(string movieGenre, string searchString)
{
// Use LINQ to get list of genres.
IQueryable<string> genreQuery = from m in _context.Movie
orderby m.Genre
select m.Genre;
var movies = from m in _context.Movie
select m;
if (!string.IsNullOrEmpty(searchString))
{
movies = movies.Where(s => s.Title!.Contains(searchString));
}
if (!string.IsNullOrEmpty(movieGenre))
{
movies = movies.Where(x => x.Genre == movieGenre);
}
var movieGenreVM = new MovieGenreViewModel
{
Genres = new SelectList(await genreQuery.Distinct().ToListAsync()),
Movies = await movies.ToListAsync()
};
return View(movieGenreVM);
}
The following code is a LINQ
query that retrieves all the genres from the database.
// Use LINQ to get list of genres.
IQueryable<string> genreQuery = from m in _context.Movie
orderby m.Genre
select m.Genre;
The SelectList
of genres is created by projecting the distinct genres (we don't want our select list to have duplicate genres).
When the user searches for the item, the search value is retained in the search box.
Add search by genre to the Index view
Update Index.cshtml
found in Views/Movies/ as follows:
@model MvcMovie.Models.MovieGenreViewModel
@{
ViewData["Title"] = "Index";
}
<h1>Index</h1>
<p>
<a asp-action="Create">Create New</a>
</p>
<form asp-controller="Movies" asp-action="Index" method="get">
<p>
<select asp-for="MovieGenre" asp-items="Model.Genres">
<option value="">All</option>
</select>
<label>Title: <input type="text" asp-for="SearchString" /></label>
<input type="submit" value="Filter" />
</p>
</form>
<table class="table">
<thead>
<tr>
<th>
@Html.DisplayNameFor(model => model.Movies[0].Title)
</th>
<th>
@Html.DisplayNameFor(model => model.Movies[0].ReleaseDate)
</th>
<th>
@Html.DisplayNameFor(model => model.Movies[0].Genre)
</th>
<th>
@Html.DisplayNameFor(model => model.Movies[0].Price)
</th>
<th></th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
@foreach (var item in Model.Movies)
{
<tr>
<td>
@Html.DisplayFor(modelItem => item.Title)
</td>
<td>
@Html.DisplayFor(modelItem => item.ReleaseDate)
</td>
<td>
@Html.DisplayFor(modelItem => item.Genre)
</td>
<td>
@Html.DisplayFor(modelItem => item.Price)
</td>
<td>
<a asp-action="Edit" asp-route-id="@item.Id">Edit</a> |
<a asp-action="Details" asp-route-id="@item.Id">Details</a> |
<a asp-action="Delete" asp-route-id="@item.Id">Delete</a>
</td>
</tr>
}
</tbody>
</table>
Examine the lambda expression used in the following HTML Helper:
@Html.DisplayNameFor(model => model.Movies[0].Title)
In the preceding code, the DisplayNameFor
HTML Helper inspects the Title
property referenced in the lambda expression to determine the display name. Since the lambda expression is inspected rather than evaluated, you don't receive an access violation when model
, model.Movies
, or model.Movies[0]
are null
or empty. When the lambda expression is evaluated (for example, @Html.DisplayFor(modelItem => item.Title)
), the model's property values are evaluated.
Test the app by searching by genre, by movie title, and by both:
In this section, you add search capability to the Index
action method that lets you search movies by genre or name.
Update the Index
method found inside Controllers/MoviesController.cs
with the following code:
public async Task<IActionResult> Index(string searchString)
{
var movies = from m in _context.Movie
select m;
if (!String.IsNullOrEmpty(searchString))
{
movies = movies.Where(s => s.Title.Contains(searchString));
}
return View(await movies.ToListAsync());
}
The first line of the Index
action method creates a LINQ query to select the movies:
var movies = from m in _context.Movie
select m;
The query is only defined at this point, it has not been run against the database.
If the searchString
parameter contains a string, the movies query is modified to filter on the value of the search string:
if (!String.IsNullOrEmpty(searchString))
{
movies = movies.Where(s => s.Title.Contains(searchString));
}
The s => s.Title.Contains()
code above is a Lambda Expression. Lambdas are used in method-based LINQ queries as arguments to standard query operator methods such as the Where method or Contains
(used in the code above). LINQ queries are not executed when they're defined or when they're modified by calling a method such as Where
, Contains
, or OrderBy
. Rather, query execution is deferred. That means that the evaluation of an expression is delayed until its realized value is actually iterated over or the ToListAsync
method is called. For more information about deferred query execution, see Query Execution.
Note: The Contains method is run on the database, not in the c# code shown above. The case sensitivity on the query depends on the database and the collation. On SQL Server, Contains maps to SQL LIKE, which is case insensitive. In SQLite, with the default collation, it's case sensitive.
Navigate to /Movies/Index
. Append a query string such as ?searchString=Ghost
to the URL. The filtered movies are displayed.
If you change the signature of the Index
method to have a parameter named id
, the id
parameter will match the optional {id}
placeholder for the default routes set in Startup.cs
.
app.UseEndpoints(endpoints =>
{
endpoints.MapControllerRoute(
name: "default",
pattern: "{controller=Home}/{action=Index}/{id?}");
});
Change the parameter to id
and all occurrences of searchString
change to id
.
The previous Index
method:
public async Task<IActionResult> Index(string searchString)
{
var movies = from m in _context.Movie
select m;
if (!String.IsNullOrEmpty(searchString))
{
movies = movies.Where(s => s.Title.Contains(searchString));
}
return View(await movies.ToListAsync());
}
The updated Index
method with id
parameter:
public async Task<IActionResult> Index(string id)
{
var movies = from m in _context.Movie
select m;
if (!String.IsNullOrEmpty(id))
{
movies = movies.Where(s => s.Title.Contains(id));
}
return View(await movies.ToListAsync());
}
You can now pass the search title as route data (a URL segment) instead of as a query string value.
However, you can't expect users to modify the URL every time they want to search for a movie. So now you'll add UI elements to help them filter movies. If you changed the signature of the Index
method to test how to pass the route-bound ID
parameter, change it back so that it takes a parameter named searchString
:
public async Task<IActionResult> Index(string searchString)
{
var movies = from m in _context.Movie
select m;
if (!String.IsNullOrEmpty(searchString))
{
movies = movies.Where(s => s.Title.Contains(searchString));
}
return View(await movies.ToListAsync());
}
Open the Views/Movies/Index.cshtml
file, and add the <form>
markup highlighted below:
ViewData["Title"] = "Index";
}
<h2>Index</h2>
<p>
<a asp-action="Create">Create New</a>
</p>
<form asp-controller="Movies" asp-action="Index">
<p>
<label>Title: <input type="text" name="SearchString" /></label>
<input type="submit" value="Filter" />
</p>
</form>
<table class="table">
<thead>
The HTML <form>
tag uses the Form Tag Helper, so when you submit the form, the filter string is posted to the Index
action of the movies controller. Save your changes and then test the filter.
There's no [HttpPost]
overload of the Index
method as you might expect. You don't need it, because the method isn't changing the state of the app, just filtering data.
You could add the following [HttpPost] Index
method.
[HttpPost]
public string Index(string searchString, bool notUsed)
{
return "From [HttpPost]Index: filter on " + searchString;
}
The notUsed
parameter is used to create an overload for the Index
method. We'll talk about that later in the tutorial.
If you add this method, the action invoker would match the [HttpPost] Index
method, and the [HttpPost] Index
method would run as shown in the image below.
However, even if you add this [HttpPost]
version of the Index
method, there's a limitation in how this has all been implemented. Imagine that you want to bookmark a particular search or you want to send a link to friends that they can click in order to see the same filtered list of movies. Notice that the URL for the HTTP POST request is the same as the URL for the GET request (localhost:{PORT}/Movies/Index) -- there's no search information in the URL. The search string information is sent to the server as a form field value. You can verify that with the browser Developer tools or the excellent Fiddler tool. The image below shows the Chrome browser Developer tools:
You can see the search parameter and XSRF token in the request body. Note, as mentioned in the previous tutorial, the Form Tag Helper generates an XSRF antiforgery token. We're not modifying data, so we don't need to validate the token in the controller method.
Because the search parameter is in the request body and not the URL, you can't capture that search information to bookmark or share with others. Fix this by specifying the request should be HTTP GET
found in the Views/Movies/Index.cshtml
file.
@model IEnumerable<MvcMovie.Models.Movie>
@{
ViewData["Title"] = "Index";
}
<h1>Index</h1>
<p>
<a asp-action="Create">Create New</a>
</p>
<form asp-controller="Movies" asp-action="Index" method="get">
<p>
<label>Title: <input type="text" name="SearchString" /></label>
<input type="submit" value="Filter" />
</p>
</form>
<table class="table">
<thead>
<tr>
<th>
@Html.DisplayNameFor(model => model.Title)
Now when you submit a search, the URL contains the search query string. Searching will also go to the HttpGet Index
action method, even if you have a HttpPost Index
method.
The following markup shows the change to the form
tag:
<form asp-controller="Movies" asp-action="Index" method="get">
Add Search by genre
Add the following MovieGenreViewModel
class to the Models folder:
using Microsoft.AspNetCore.Mvc.Rendering;
using System.Collections.Generic;
namespace MvcMovie.Models
{
public class MovieGenreViewModel
{
public List<Movie> Movies { get; set; }
public SelectList Genres { get; set; }
public string MovieGenre { get; set; }
public string SearchString { get; set; }
}
}
The movie-genre view model will contain:
- A list of movies.
- A
SelectList
containing the list of genres. This allows the user to select a genre from the list. MovieGenre
, which contains the selected genre.SearchString
, which contains the text users enter in the search text box.
Replace the Index
method in MoviesController.cs
with the following code:
// GET: Movies
public async Task<IActionResult> Index(string movieGenre, string searchString)
{
// Use LINQ to get list of genres.
IQueryable<string> genreQuery = from m in _context.Movie
orderby m.Genre
select m.Genre;
var movies = from m in _context.Movie
select m;
if (!string.IsNullOrEmpty(searchString))
{
movies = movies.Where(s => s.Title.Contains(searchString));
}
if (!string.IsNullOrEmpty(movieGenre))
{
movies = movies.Where(x => x.Genre == movieGenre);
}
var movieGenreVM = new MovieGenreViewModel
{
Genres = new SelectList(await genreQuery.Distinct().ToListAsync()),
Movies = await movies.ToListAsync()
};
return View(movieGenreVM);
}
The following code is a LINQ
query that retrieves all the genres from the database.
// Use LINQ to get list of genres.
IQueryable<string> genreQuery = from m in _context.Movie
orderby m.Genre
select m.Genre;
The SelectList
of genres is created by projecting the distinct genres (we don't want our select list to have duplicate genres).
When the user searches for the item, the search value is retained in the search box.
Add search by genre to the Index view
Update Index.cshtml
found in Views/Movies/ as follows:
@model MvcMovie.Models.MovieGenreViewModel
@{
ViewData["Title"] = "Index";
}
<h1>Index</h1>
<p>
<a asp-action="Create">Create New</a>
</p>
<form asp-controller="Movies" asp-action="Index" method="get">
<p>
<select asp-for="MovieGenre" asp-items="Model.Genres">
<option value="">All</option>
</select>
<label>Title: <input type="text" asp-for="SearchString" /></label>
<input type="submit" value="Filter" />
</p>
</form>
<table class="table">
<thead>
<tr>
<th>
@Html.DisplayNameFor(model => model.Movies[0].Title)
</th>
<th>
@Html.DisplayNameFor(model => model.Movies[0].ReleaseDate)
</th>
<th>
@Html.DisplayNameFor(model => model.Movies[0].Genre)
</th>
<th>
@Html.DisplayNameFor(model => model.Movies[0].Price)
</th>
<th></th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
@foreach (var item in Model.Movies)
{
<tr>
<td>
@Html.DisplayFor(modelItem => item.Title)
</td>
<td>
@Html.DisplayFor(modelItem => item.ReleaseDate)
</td>
<td>
@Html.DisplayFor(modelItem => item.Genre)
</td>
<td>
@Html.DisplayFor(modelItem => item.Price)
</td>
<td>
<a asp-action="Edit" asp-route-id="@item.Id">Edit</a> |
<a asp-action="Details" asp-route-id="@item.Id">Details</a> |
<a asp-action="Delete" asp-route-id="@item.Id">Delete</a>
</td>
</tr>
}
</tbody>
</table>
Examine the lambda expression used in the following HTML Helper:
@Html.DisplayNameFor(model => model.Movies[0].Title)
In the preceding code, the DisplayNameFor
HTML Helper inspects the Title
property referenced in the lambda expression to determine the display name. Since the lambda expression is inspected rather than evaluated, you don't receive an access violation when model
, model.Movies
, or model.Movies[0]
are null
or empty. When the lambda expression is evaluated (for example, @Html.DisplayFor(modelItem => item.Title)
), the model's property values are evaluated.
Test the app by searching by genre, by movie title, and by both:
ASP.NET Core