Share via

Who benefits from network analysis: ethics of social network research

  • Article

The success of social network research (SNR) has led to expectations that in addition to academic

research, SNR can introduce people to one another, solve organizational problems, map the epidemiology

of AIDS, and catch criminals and terrorists. Since SNR requires that names of both respondents

and their contacts be collected and used in most analyses, Institutional Review Boards become very

concerned. Experiences of the author, participants in the 2003 Sun Belt Conference and the Social

Network List Serve illustrate ethical issues. Proper handling of the data and the analysis, including

complete control by the investigator can virtually eliminate harm to respondents and those they nominate,

though perhaps not to the satisfaction of IRBs. On the benefit side, academic researchers always

benefit, organizations, society and science may benefit, but individual respondents rarely do.

© 2005 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

https://www.sciencedirect.com/science?_ob=IssueURL&_tockey=%23TOC%235969%232005%23999729997%23592244%23FLA%23Volume_27,_Issue_2,_Pages_89-167_(May_2005)%2BMEthical_Dilemmas_in_Social_Network_Research%2BMEdited_by_Ronald_L._Breiger&_auth=y&encodedHandle=V-WA-A-W-A-MsSAYWA-UUA-U-AAWAAEBCDV-AAAYDDVBDV-AZZCDCEBZ-A-U&view=c&_acct=C000060897&_version=1&_urlVersion=0&_userid=3765386&md5=d8496b18b28bfd6d13d5282cdaafcc89&subset=y

Comments