What to do if MSMQ has problems loading storage files.
Back in the Windows 2000 era, a common problem was how to recover when MSMQ was allowed to build up over 1.7GB of messages. On startup, MSMQ would try and map into memory all the 4MB files in the System32\MSMQ\Storage directory. The process' virtual memory would fill up and the MSMQ service could not complete initialisation.
This KB article explains some of the background:
The workaround is to move all the P*.MQ, L*.MQ and J*.MQ files to another directory, after which the service should start successfully (until the next time it is allowed to fill up again...). Any R*.MQ files can be discarded as they are not used for recoverable messages.
Now you still have a backup directory of MQ files containing messages that you may require to process. The messages are not lost - the storage files just need to be loaded into memory again. Obviously, you don't just copy all the files back to the Storage directory as you would be back to square one again. Instead, you copy files in batches.
It is important to understand that the MQ files exist in pairs - for example, the file P0003420.MQ requires its partner L0003420.MQ. The 4MB file contains the message data and the 8kB file is an indexing bitmap. If you lose the indexing bitmap, the message data cannot be interpreted. So when you restore the data files, don't orphan any files. For reference:
Message Queuing does not start and an Event ID 2083 error message is logged
Another item of note is how to handle transactional messages. It is possible to send multiple messages within one transaction but MSMQ will store them in any storage file that has space. This could mean spreading the messages between multiple files (although not cutting up messages - each message is kept intact). Now you don't know - and cannot find out - which files contain all the pieces of your transaction. The result could be that, if you are restoring the files in batches, you have an incomplete transaction - which MSMQ will abort for you. If you are using single transactions (1 message - 1 transaction) then you don't have to worry.
Still on transactional messages, you need to be aware of the sequencing information that MSMQ keeps track of. As explained in the KB below, there are 5 files (QMLOG, MQInSeqs.lg1, MQInSeqs.lg2, MQTrans.lg1, MQTrans.lg2) that store the history of transactional message processing. The transactional messages in the storage files rely on the correct information in the history files. If the history data is missing or out of date then transactional messages may be duplicated. It is therefore important to not only backup the history files with the message files but also not to put any new messages into the system before processing the existing backlog.
If the problem is with the transactional message processing files then you may see the following events:
- Event ID 2053 — Message Queuing Logging and Checkpoint Events
- The incoming sequences checkpoint file failed to initialize. The file MQInSeqs.lg1 or MQInSeqs.lg2 in the Msmq\Storage folder is corrupted or absent.
- Event ID 2064 — Message Queuing Logging and Checkpoint Events
- The transactions checkpoint file failed to initialize. The file MQTrans.lg1 or MQTrans.lg2 in the Msmq\Storage folder are corrupted or absent.
- Event ID 2076 — Message Queuing Logging and Checkpoint Events
- The logger files cannot be initialized. The file QMLog in the Msmq\Storage folder is corrupted or absent.
- Event ID 2078 — Message Queuing Logging and Checkpoint Events
- The Message Queuing service cannot start. The checkpoint files cannot be recovered.
- Event ID 2079 — Message Queuing Logging and Checkpoint Events
- The Message Queuing service cannot start. The log file cannot be recovered.
The solutions here boil down to deleting the log files and forcing MSMQ to recreate them with the LogDataCreated registry value.
Comments
Anonymous
May 01, 2009
your security certificate expired on 2009-04-30. I had to put your site on exception list to access.Anonymous
May 01, 2009
Hi, Thanks for spotting this. I just use the plain HTTP interface to manage my Blog and hadn't noticed. I've reported it to the people that support the site. Cheers John Breakwell (MSFT)Anonymous
May 05, 2009
Should be fixed now. Cheers John