A Virtual Economy for Forums?
While I was in China the forum engineers pointed us at some of the more popular forums. These forums had an interesting Virtual economy. Rather than simply rewarding points for participation users could also exchange their reputation between one another. One example of this is https://iask.com/. Our friends in Shanghai translated their rules for us for consideration on Microsoft communities...
Earn Points By...
- Register and get +20
- Activate email box successfully +20
- Any time you sign in +5 each day
- Submit question or reply +1 for each post
- Marking an answer +1 each time
- Reply marked as an answer +10 +the question's offered reward point
- vote or submit comment successfully +1 points each time (10 per day at most)
- Your question becomes popular +10
Spend or Lose Points By...
- set "offered reward" points bounty when asking questions -offered reward points
- don't set question status when it expires -20
- cancel the question when it has answer already -20
- exchange small gift -gift's points
Other Notes...
- Vote: when there are multiple answers, you may set a vote to let other participants to select the best answer for you
- The question expire time is 15 days by default
- If there is no answers, you can increase your "offered reward" points and get another 15 days expire time.
- When a question expires, you can still handle it such as set answer, and etc.
What other non-paid membership communities have you seen successfully implement this sort of system? Do you like this sort of system?
Comments
Anonymous
February 16, 2007
There's been some successful Western-based forums that have used a reward-based system. None that I know of that have the diversity that you describe. www.Experts-Exchange.com is one that comes to mind. The problem with that type of system is that people new to the forum have a hard time getting the answers they need. Answerers tend to favour the questions with the higher points and the new members just don't have any. It ends up turning into a bit of a clique. I like the idea of subtracting points to favour socially-accepted behaviour. -10 for posting to the wrong forum, for example; would make for better discoverability and inevitably better answer rates and quality.Anonymous
February 16, 2007
It's an interesting idea that Josh Ledgard learned is being used in China, and blogged about here . IAnonymous
February 17, 2007
Although it's not a support forum, one of the largest forums in the world, Gaia Online, also uses a rewards based virtual economy system. You get "gold" for logging in, reading threads, creating threads, and writing posts. This gold can be used to buy alterations to your avatar from stores or other players. They also have some mini-games that allow you to win gold, and you can just give it away if you want. http://www.gaiaonline.com/forum/index.phpAnonymous
February 17, 2007
Here's a page describing the Gaia currency system: http://www.gaiaonline.com/info/about.php?info=goldAnonymous
February 17, 2007
http://www.experts-exchange.com -- Has been around of a long time and many of its sub-forums are pretty useful for developers.Anonymous
February 19, 2007
The comment has been removedAnonymous
February 19, 2007
The comment has been removedAnonymous
February 19, 2007
@Josh. I took the "Reward points" and the "Bounty" to be "money changing hands", similar to the way Experts-Exchange. I assumed a user couldn't offer reward points they didn't have. @Will/Josh. To a certain extent requiring users to be "logged in" in order to add content to the community doesn't really guard against anonymity. You're still able to enter any pseudonym you want and not make your email public. Even if forum admins could get access to a member's email, it's trivial to make it "untraceable". I wouldn't go so far as to allow people to reply/ask questions without being "logged in"; but it could be made easier to register to log in. The whole Passport route is a bit convoluted. I imagine that will change slightly with new releases of Live ID.Anonymous
February 19, 2007
Feels like this concept is more tested than I imagined. There are some good comments from the post I