KB: Forefront Client Security Malware Summary reports "There is no relevant information"
Here’s a KB we just published that talks about a condition where the status displayed in the FCS Malware Summary report may be a little bit confusing:
=====
Summary
When viewing the Forefront Client Security (FCS) Malware Summary, it may not contain any data and instead simply report "There is no relevant information."
More Information
This occurs if no malware has been detected in the last 24 hours. This is by design.
When there is no malware that has been reported in the last 24 hours, the Malware Summary will not show a graph for 0. Instead it will say "There is no relevant information" as mentioned above.
=====
For the most current version of this article please see the following:
2787508 - Forefront Client Security Malware Summary reports "There is no relevant information"
J.C. Hornbeck | Knowledge Engineer | Management and Security Division
Get the latest System Center news on Facebook and Twitter :
App-V Team blog: https://blogs.technet.com/appv/
ConfigMgr Support Team blog: https://blogs.technet.com/configurationmgr/
DPM Team blog: https://blogs.technet.com/dpm/
MED-V Team blog: https://blogs.technet.com/medv/
Orchestrator Support Team blog: https://blogs.technet.com/b/orchestrator/
Operations Manager Team blog: https://blogs.technet.com/momteam/
SCVMM Team blog: https://blogs.technet.com/scvmm
Server App-V Team blog: https://blogs.technet.com/b/serverappv
Service Manager Team blog: https://blogs.technet.com/b/servicemanager
System Center Essentials Team blog: https://blogs.technet.com/b/systemcenteressentials
WSUS Support Team blog: https://blogs.technet.com/sus/
The Forefront Server Protection blog: https://blogs.technet.com/b/fss/
The Forefront Endpoint Security blog : https://blogs.technet.com/b/clientsecurity/
The Forefront Identity Manager blog : https://blogs.msdn.com/b/ms-identity-support/
The Forefront TMG blog: https://blogs.technet.com/b/isablog/
The Forefront UAG blog: https://blogs.technet.com/b/edgeaccessblog/
Comments
- Anonymous
January 01, 2003
thank you