Greetings & Welcome to Microsoft Q&A forum! Thanks for posting your query!
Thank you for bringing this to our attention. You're correct that currently, scanning Unity Catalog with Purview doesn't offer the same granular table selection as scanning regular Databricks workspaces. This can indeed impact workflows requiring precise control over scanned data.
Identified Limitation
Currently, when scanning Azure Databricks Unity Catalog with Microsoft Purview, you can choose to scan the entire Unity Catalog or scope the scan to a subset of catalogs, but not to specific tables. This limitation means that granular control over table selection during scans is not supported at this time.
Workaround and Future Updates
Unfortunately, there is no direct workaround available at this time for this specific limitation and we don't have any ETA on this. It is advisable to monitor updates from Azure Databricks, as they may address this issue in future releases. Keeping an eye on the release notes or announcements from Databricks can provide insights into any enhancements related to Unity Catalog.
Appreciate if you could share the feedback on our feedback channel. Which would be open for the user community to upvote & comment on. This allows our product teams to effectively prioritize your request against our existing feature backlog and gives insight into the potential impact of implementing the suggested feature.
I hope this information helps. Please do let us know if you have any further queries.
If this answers your query, do click Accept Answer
and Yes
for was this answer helpful. And, if you have any further query do let us know.