Hi Paraplexo,
If i now configure the virtual disk on the VMs manually with a 1 column but still mirrored, this should reduce the footprint, right? I tested already, this seems to work.
What do you mean "it works", we can change the column, but does the total data size reduce, in your example, two-way mirror 2 column of 400G, and two-way mirror 1 column decrease to 200G?
As far as I'm concerned, it won't. It should be two-way mirror 2 column 200G and two-way mirror 1 column 200G. The data in total is depended on the mirror type, not the column.
For two-way mirror 1 column with 4 disks, d1, d2, d3, d4; for example, d1+d2 is the primary disk, d3,d4 is the mirror disk; when it writes data, it will write default primary 256k stripe to d1, mirrored 256k to d3, when d1 is full, write primary 256k stripe to d2, mirrored 256K to d4;
For two-way mirror 2 column with 4 disks, d1,d2,d3,d4; d1+d3 in column1, d2+d4 in column2, when write data, one primary 256K into d1, mirror 256K into d3, the following 256K into d2, mirrored 256K into d4. In this way, the following 256K has no need to wait for the above 256 finish writing into d1, it can be quickly written into d2.
So two-way mirror 2 column with 4 disks will increase the performance.
Related article for your reference:
Best Regards,
Anne