This browser is no longer supported.
Upgrade to Microsoft Edge to take advantage of the latest features, security updates, and technical support.
![](data:image/svg+xml, %3Csvg xmlns='http://www.w3.org/2000/svg' height='64' class='font-weight-bold' style='font: 600 30.11764705882353px "SegoeUI", Arial' width='64'%3E%3Ccircle fill='hsl(150.4, 33%, 24%)' cx='32' cy='32' r='32' /%3E%3Ctext x='50%25' y='55%25' dominant-baseline='middle' text-anchor='middle' fill='%23FFF' %3EBZ%3C/text%3E%3C/svg%3E)
Hi, in case when Management Group (Management Server) is in one forest/domain and monitored servers are in other, untrusted forest/domain what is better - placing Gateway Server in the same forest/domain with Management Group (Management Server) or in the other, untrusted forest/domain.
![](data:image/svg+xml, %3Csvg xmlns='http://www.w3.org/2000/svg' height='64' class='font-weight-bold' style='font: 600 30.11764705882353px "SegoeUI", Arial' width='64'%3E%3Ccircle fill='hsl(150.4, 92%, 24%)' cx='32' cy='32' r='32' /%3E%3Ctext x='50%25' y='55%25' dominant-baseline='middle' text-anchor='middle' fill='%23FFF' %3EXM%3C/text%3E%3C/svg%3E)
Hi,
It's generally better to place the Gateway Server in the untrusted forest/domain.
By placing the Gateway Server in the untrusted domain, you only need to manage certificates and firewall rules for the Gateway Server and the Management Server, rather than for each individual agent.
Yep, I did exactly that and everything works like a charm.