Freigeben über

Office 365 Client Updates via WSUS

  • Artikel

Many of you have already seen the announcement that Configuration Manager can now be set up to sync Office 365 ProPlus updates directly. This scenario is a direct response to requests for control of distributing these updates, and is an improvement on the past model (wherein Office 365 ProPlus updates circumvented Microsoft Update and WSUS altogether); however, there may be a nonzero cost to WSUS administrators that do not use Configuration Manager. This post discusses how to mitigate that cost if you are affected by the change.

 

The Office 365 Client category now appears in the WSUS Products and Classifications pane:

 

If you’ve configured WSUS to sync this content, then you’ll see new updates in the console:

Deploying these updates without Configuration Manager is not supported, so the content described above is essentially useless to a WSUS standalone administrator. Depending on your situation, we recommend that you take one of the following actions:

  1. Deselect the Office 365 Client product so that WSUS does not sync this content from Microsoft Update. 

  2. For those running Small Business Server or other flavors that do not allow product filtering, decline all updates for the Office 365 Client product, which can be identified by the update title.

 

Please let us know if there are any questions on this new content in WSUS.

Comments

  • Anonymous
    April 14, 2016
    Are you planning to allow WSUS to deploy these updates without an SCCM infrastructure in the future?
  • Anonymous
    April 15, 2016
    This seems like a very poor choice. Deploying updates through SCCM is a big change as you have to package updates. We do not have the support staff capacity to do that.
  • Anonymous
    April 15, 2016
    RP: There are no plans to support this via WSUS standalone at this time. My preference would be to support this scenario without the use of this workaround, which is not possible with the current implementation. We've got other changes coming in WSUS that are higher priority, but if there's a clear need in the ecosystem, then we may look at ways to support this in the WSUS standalone scenario.

    Typhoon87: The old model required manual deployments of MSI packages via Configuration Manager, and did not use the conventional Microsoft Update pipeline that all other first-party updates use. With this change from the Office/Configuration Manager teams, this content can be deployed like a regular update, so it should not require the specific packaging that you describe. Can you clarify why you would need additional support staff because of this change?
    • Anonymous
      November 28, 2017
      Its a year+ later. Have you guys found time to include this yet? Do you need us to get out and push?
  • Anonymous
    April 15, 2016
    You could probably use Automatic Depoyment Rules to ease the deployment of updates using SCCM, pretty much automated that way and really less manipulation to be done. There is no real package to be done while deploying updates.
  • Anonymous
    April 16, 2016
    Yes ADRs via SCCM is the way to go here. Works like a champ. Fire & forget.
  • Anonymous
    April 21, 2016
    What's the back-out strategy looks like when using ConfigMgr? If we need to roll back to the previous build, what does the process look like?
  • Anonymous
    July 21, 2016
    I too think it's a sad choice not supporting a WSUS only plan. Makes it a lot more complicated and more expensive for someone not having SCCM...
  • Anonymous
    September 15, 2016
    Please support Office 365 update through standalone WSUS as small businesses cannot afford to have SCCM.
  • Anonymous
    September 22, 2016
    I would also like to strongly request that time be spent to enable the distribution of Office 365 source from the WSUS system. We are currently hosting our sources on netshares at various locations around the world and we run a scheduled script that pulls this from Microsoft and syncs it to these shares. We already have a robust WSUS infrastructure, WSUS is the logical way to pull and host these sources, and this would give us far more visibility in the conditions of our endpoints. If possible we would also like to see the same P2P/mesh type of file sharing that is being employed with Windows 10 (also a software as a service technology) used with Office 365.
  • Anonymous
    September 23, 2016
    Another stupid decision. Just stick the updates into WSUS, that's what it is there for. Conf Mgr is yet another needless cost to small businesses.
  • Anonymous
    September 29, 2016
    Just discovering this article.Interesting thing is that WSUS detects and pushes the updates out to all the Office 365 clients running on Win10Pro. The updates download successfully and appear to install successfully. But this happens every night. So if I check the client side update history there is a long list of the same updates being installed over several nights... that is until I manually update through Office (i.e. Word 2016, etc.). Office then successfully updates, the version number changes, and Windows clients no longer shows the update that needs to be installed, and WSUS detects that it is no longer needed.Before I turned on Office365 updates in WSUS, Office would never update and always errored out when manually checking for updates. Guess I'll look for other articles why that might be. It would be nice to have this supported though.
  • Anonymous
    January 06, 2017
    What a disappointment that Microsoft's solution to updating Office 365 is the most expensive and most infrastructure intensive solution possible. WSUS should be supported, plain and simple.
  • Anonymous
    February 08, 2017
    Please add support for a WSUS-only system!
  • Anonymous
    April 16, 2017
    So glad we have stayed with the MSI-based Office 2016. We'd be underwater if we had went with Office 365 since you can't even update it via WSUS.Honestly, I don't mind the cost of Office 365, but because of decisions like these, there is a lot more overhead involved. Office 365 is not worth it.
  • Anonymous
    June 01, 2017
    My WSUS is downloading Office 2016 updates (over 40 gigs) but none of my clients are receiving any updates. Is there something more I need to do to get WSUS to distribute the updates to the clients?
    • Anonymous
      June 02, 2017
      Are those updates approved for the clients? Are they being detected as Needed by the clients? Both must be true in order to deploy a given update.
  • Anonymous
    June 02, 2017
    Do we need WSUS 4.0 for managing office 365 updates via SCCM ?
    • Anonymous
      June 12, 2017
      Current Branch versions of Configuration Manager require at least WSUS 4.0 running underneath them. This feature was added in Config Manager CB 1602, which does not support WSUS 3.0/1/2.
  • Anonymous
    August 04, 2017
    With the mess of Office updates coming out lately (attachments not opening/broken search) getting some control of which updates are pushed via WSUS is becoming important. It's been a total headache with clients who are using clicktorun vs old school office with WSUS