Freigeben über

IE in XP SP2 (Part 3): Web Site Compatibility

  • Artikel

See Also: Authenticode - No, and never again! and Information Bar - Stopping the modal dialog madness

Microsoft cares a lot about application compatibility. So does the IE team, but we have an additional burden: web site compatibility. I think I can safely say that there are more web sites (intranet and internet) than there are applications, and many of them are built in a way that is closely tied to specific IE functionality.

While we really try to avoid making changes that affect compatibility, security is one thing that takes precedence. This means that with the large number of security fixes and features in XP SP2 some web sites will break. Between now and RTM things should get a little bit better, but we can't provide workarounds for every web site, and even when we can provide workaround the experience may not be as smooth as it was before.

In other words, if you're a web site developer or you have an application that hosts the web browser control you should strongly consider installing XP SP2 RC1 to test it out. Similarly, if your users are reporting bugs, don't discount them because they're running a pre-release version of XP SP2.

Below are some common types of problems that you should try to avoid.

Authenticode

As noted in earlier posts, IE no longer immediately launches the Authenticode dialog when it encounters an <OBJECT> tag. Instead, there is a more subtle non-modal piece of UI known as the Information Bar that lets the user know a control is present. This causes problems when web sites specifically rely on there being a modal dialog that blocks the web page. Example issues:

  • Scripting an ActiveX control immediately after instantiating it, assuming the user will install it. (The user will get a script error, as they would if they clicked "No" pre-SP2.)
  • Detecting that the ActiveX control wasn't successfully installed and navigating to an error page. In XP SP2 you'll navigate away from the page that gives the user the ability to install the control via. the modeless UI.
  • Having the first instance of the ActiveX control after a form submit. In order for the user to install the control they now have to refresh the page, potentially doing a second submit. (Bonus points if the second form submit causes a duplicate purchase of an expensive product.)

Fortunately for web developers, ActiveX controls only need to be installed once. Make that experience work and you don't have much else to worry about here.

Pop-up Windows (non-user-initiated)

The best thing is to simply avoid showing pop-up windows. This shouldn't be news to anybody as there are literally dozens of pop-up blockers out there (in addition to being built into most major 3rd party browsers), but we've encountered plenty of sites that don't function well when pop-ups are blocked. Example issues:

  • Redirecting when a pop-up is blocked.
  • Instantiating an ActiveX control from a pop-up, especially if you close the window if it fails.
  • Having one pop-up launch another pop-up in another domain. (Bonus points if the second pop-up attempts to install an ActiveX control or download a file, and the chain of pop-ups does a cascading close when the control is blocked.)
  • One-time pop-ups that the user needs to see, but can't be replayed even after refreshing the page.

Downloads

As noted in earlier posts, non-user-initiated downloads are blocked by default. This is something I haven't seen other browsers do and it may require a few download sites to adapt. Fortunately there's plenty of time before most users will have XP SP2. Example issues:

  • Instead of launching the download directly, using the link to navigate to a page that kicks off the download using a timer.
  • Creating a timeout, after which the server refuses to cough up the file. I've seen pages where I can start the download if I click the Information Bar within five seconds, but not after that.
  • Launching a download from a pop-up window.

HTML Dialogs

The Information Bar is a component of the web browser control and will not show up if you host mshtml directly, therefore some of the above items may be blocked outright with easy no end-user workaround. showModalDialog() and showModelessDialog() are where most web sites will encounter this.

MIME Type Handling

I'm not as familiar with this feature, I've run into problems caused by the security restrictions on a few web sites. The primary issue is servers that are misconfigured to send the type "text/plain" for binary file types such as streaming video or music.

Local Machine Zone Scripting

As mentioned in part 2, this is one of the most impactful changes. Again, I'm not intimately familiar with this feature, but if you're doing any kind of scripting from local HTML files that get launched in Internet Explorer (or shell Explorer) you should look into the documentation for XP SP2 RC1 for how to use "mark of the web" and other mitigations. 

Of special note here are Explorer Bars and Desk Bands. We've seen several instances where these require the user to use the Information Bar to unblock script/content. In some cases the Information Bar is barely clickable due to the size.

Comments

  • Anonymous
    March 29, 2004
    The comment has been removed

  • Anonymous
    March 29, 2004
    The comment has been removed

  • Anonymous
    March 30, 2004
    Stephane, I'll talk to some people about this.

  • Anonymous
    March 30, 2004
    Pete, I hope to post soon on how you can opt-in to the IE security mitigations, including the Information Bar.

    By default it only affects the iexplore.exe and explorer.exe processes.

  • Anonymous
    March 30, 2004
    Regarding pop-ups... Imagine Windows without dialogs. Hopefully the "user-initiated" criteria stays firm in the minds of browser developers, though I know Opera can be a little brat about it.

  • Anonymous
    March 30, 2004
    This blog is great, thanks. However something more formal would also be nice. There's a note here describing the IE SP2 change documentation that we don't seem to have seen yet:

    http://www.zeepe.net/dasBlog/default,date,2004-03-27.aspx

  • Anonymous
    March 30, 2004
    Sticking to user initiated pop-up windows and downloads has to be one of the most dramatic changes to IE in years. I almost feel bad for all those popup blockers that will render useless after SP2. However, there are a bunch of sites that make fair use of automatic downloads, for example, to select the nearest site mirror or for statistical purposes. Anyway, security first.

  • Anonymous
    March 30, 2004
    Site changes with new IE/Win: The upcoming Service Pack 2 of Windows XP will change specific functionality in Microsoft Internet Explorer. (See last week's links.) Here, Tony Schreiner of Microsoft discusses specific features on existing websites which may be affected...

  • Anonymous
    March 30, 2004
    The comment has been removed

  • Anonymous
    March 30, 2004
    --- have you taken a look at the following site ---

    No, but we're looking now. Thanks.

  • Anonymous
    April 02, 2004
    Will the IE SP2 also be part of Windows Update for people that don't have XP SP2? I'm trying to determine how many of my end users will have this version of the browser and how quickly. If just people with XP SP2, that would slow down deployment. However, if Windows Update also installs it for Win2k, WinMe, etc. then more people will have it sooner.

  • Anonymous
    April 02, 2004
    Mindy, there isn't yet any information I can share on if/when/how this may be ported downlevel and distributed. If anything happens it would certainly lag SP2, which isn't due out for another couple months.

  • Anonymous
    April 29, 2004
    Hi. Can anyone tell me why Microsoft allows the "Mark of the Web" to function as a workaround for Local Machine Zone Lockdown? It seems like any malicious hacker could just insert the "Mark of the Web" in all his or her pages to circumvent this new security feature of XP SP2.

  • Anonymous
    April 29, 2004
    When you insert the "Mark of the Web", it makes the page behave as if it's a normal web page. That means the page is no longer running in the Local Machine Zone and doesn't have access to local files and such.

  • Anonymous
    May 15, 2004
    more to the point, when are we gona get the PNG support that we find on other web browsers that allready have it

  • Anonymous
    May 17, 2004
    Someday, maybe, someday.

  • Anonymous
    July 06, 2004
    What about a mark of the web for XML pages? Is there anything I can do to make sure XML pages will also be placed out of the local machine zone?

  • Anonymous
    July 07, 2004
    Yair, as far as I know there is currently no way to do that.

  • Anonymous
    May 29, 2009
    PingBack from http://paidsurveyshub.info/story.php?title=tony-schreiner-s-weblog-ie-in-xp-sp2-part-3-web-site-compatibility

  • Anonymous
    June 02, 2009
    PingBack from http://woodtvstand.info/story.php?id=85222