Freigeben über

Naming Direct Output Variables

  • Artikel

In my series of Zero-Friction TDD tips and tricks, it's time to look at naming Direct Output variables.

 [TestMethod]

 public void DoStuffWillReturnMessage()

 {

     // Fixture setup

     string expectedResult = "ploeh";

     MyClass sut = new MyClass();

     // Exercise system

     string result = sut.DoStuff(expectedResult);

     // Verify outcome

     Assert.AreEqual<string>(expectedResult, result, "DoStuff");

     // Teardown

 }

As you can see, I use the name result for the return value of DoStuff, and I always use that word, irrespective of its type or other circumstances. Whether you prefer result or another word is not important; the salient point is that by always using the same word, you save a context switch (because you don't have to stop and think of a good name) and thereby incrementally increase your productivity.

Comments

  • Anonymous
    November 17, 2008
    PingBack from http://blogs.msdn.com/ploeh/archive/2008/11/13/zero-friction-tdd.aspx

  • Anonymous
    May 17, 2012
    I like to name the output variable "actualResult" because I feel it makes it more obvious for other readers that the actualResult needs to be compared with the "expectedResult".

  • Anonymous
    August 06, 2013
    Agree with BillW33