Freigeben über


Competitive Advantages of Windows Server 2012 Hyper-V over VMware vSphere 5.1

With the release of Windows Server 2012 on September 4th and recent announcements by VMware at VMworld it was time to see how we are doing from a technical perspective.

We have released a paper in which we compare Windows Server 2012, Hyper-V Server 2012 with VMware vSphere Hypervisor and VMware vSphere Enterprise Plus.

In this paper, we have looked at a significant number of the new capabilities that are available within Windows Server 2012 Hyper-V, across 4 key investment areas:

  • ? Scalability, Performance & Density
  • ? Secure Multitenancy
  • ? Flexible Infrastructure
  • ? High Availability & Resiliency

Across each of these areas, we’ve detailed how Windows Server 2012 Hyper-V offers more scale, a more comprehensive array of customer-driven features and capabilities, and a greater level of extensibility and flexibility than the standalone VMware vSphere Hypervisor or VMware vSphere 5.1. With features such as Hyper-V Replica, cluster sizes of up to 64 nodes and 8,000 virtual machines, Storage and Shared-Nothing Live Migration, the Hyper-V Extensible Switch, Network Virtualization, and powerful guest clustering capabilities, it’s clear to see that Windows Server 2012 Hyper-V offers the most comprehensive virtualization platform for the next generation of cloud-optimized infrastructures.

The paper can be downloaded here.

Comments

  • Anonymous
    January 01, 2003
    8,000 vm / cluster ? 4,000 vm / cluster  at TechNet "Hyper-V Server 2012 Comparison"    technet.microsoft.com/.../jj647789  at "Hyper-V featurs comparison"    download.microsoft.com/.../WS%202012%20Feature%20Comparison_Hyper-V.pdf

  • Anonymous
    September 07, 2012
    Too late now likely...  You mention this covers "5.1", yet the PDF is named "...5.0.pdf".

  • Anonymous
    September 09, 2012
    Just like Microsoft to say that it's un fairly leap frogged the competition. I though MS might have actual gotten it right this time. The partner conference was a little disappointing... Looks like our Enterprise customers will be VMware shops for a bit longer. MS isn't quite there yet? They have made substantial progress though.

  • Anonymous
    October 04, 2012
    @Marco It indeed applies to 5.1 @Yoshihiro Yes, 8000 VM's in a cluster!

  • Anonymous
    February 14, 2013
    8000 cluster???

  • Anonymous
    February 14, 2013
    Yes, 8000 VM's in a cluster!

  • Anonymous
    November 18, 2013
    good article. however, majority of clients would like to see how those two vendors compare when it comes to licensing

  • Anonymous
    June 14, 2015
    i was too late to view this, the doc seems to have been removed or i do not have access to view. Pls let me know how i can get access to the doc if the doc is still valid in the current tech scenario

  • Anonymous
    June 15, 2015
    The document is not available for download . Kindly provide a link to download

  • Anonymous
    July 23, 2015
    How come your are comparing to vSphere 5.1 & not 6.0 which is the latest release.

  • Anonymous
    July 23, 2015
    @Bob : Good question !