Hinweis
Für den Zugriff auf diese Seite ist eine Autorisierung erforderlich. Sie können versuchen, sich anzumelden oder das Verzeichnis zu wechseln.
Für den Zugriff auf diese Seite ist eine Autorisierung erforderlich. Sie können versuchen, das Verzeichnis zu wechseln.
Another question in internal discussion.
Here is one reply:
From:
Subject: RE: DLL Injection
DLL injection is never safe. You're talking about squirting code into a process that was never designed, built, or tested by the process's author, and co-opting or creating a thread to run that code. You run the risk of creating timing, synchronization, or resource issues that weren't there before or exacerbating issues that were there.
Comments
- Anonymous
February 19, 2004
And yet this is something some companies are forced to do every day, as a matter of practice, due to lack of extensibility in the platform. It's been happening for at least a decade. - Anonymous
February 19, 2004
Do you know the reason why those companies opt to use this technique? Just curious. - Anonymous
February 20, 2004
The comment has been removed - Anonymous
May 06, 2004
How to use PerformCallBack4? because this function have structure CALLBACKINFO and what parameter LPVOID1 , LPVOD2 ,..