Freigeben über


New OLE info for Outlook 2007 and the NDL option for Connector for Lotus Notes

Hello it’s Lou again, I’d like to thank Omar Castillo Rodriguez for his work on this topic.

 

“In Office 2007 here are your two options for OLE-

1. Use the registry key that we need modify to enable Outlook 2007 to permit the access to OLE Objects is “HKCU\Software\Policies\Microsoft\Office\12.0\Outlook\Security” and the DWORD value that you must create to enable the feature is “AllowInPlaceOLEActivation” equal to 1.

2. The second option is to use the templates, located here-> Office 2007 Admin Templates

https://www.microsoft.com/downloads/details.aspx?FamilyId=92D8519A-E143-4AEE-8F7A-E4BBAEBA13E7&displaylang=en

Thanks Omar! In addition, the newer versions of the Connector for Lotus Notes for Exchange 2003, support a fourth option, NDL’s, a Notes document link as an attachment.

 

See this article on how to enable it- Lotus Notes DocLinks in e-mail messages are replaced with bitmap icons in Exchange 2003 Lotus Notes DocLinks in e-mail messages are replaced with bitmap icons in Exchange 2003-https://support.microsoft.com/kb/920781/en-us

 

In addition here is my previous blog on this topic.

Previous Blog on OLE Options

https://blogs.technet.com/collabtools/archive/2006/04/20/425760.aspx

 

Thanks! -Lou

Comments

  • Anonymous
    January 01, 2003
    Exchange 2007: So Far, So Good Read Your Exchange Emails With Gmail Exchange 2007 and Outlook 2007 -

  • Anonymous
    January 01, 2003
    I have one add-on to this excelent post : To enable ole objectlink I added two other key in the registry to make enable the olelink [HKEY_CURRENT_USERSoftwarePoliciesMicrosoftOffice12.0OutlookSecurity] ("AllowInPlaceOLEActivation"=dword:00000001) "ShowOLEPackageObj"=dword:00000001 "AdminSecurityMode"=dword:00000003 All informations about security in Outlook 2007 were describe here : http://support.microsoft.com/kb/926512/en-us « Enable in-place activation of embedded OLE objects » Thanks Lou for your Help

  • Anonymous
    January 01, 2003
    I have gotten this type of question three times in the last few months, and it has never come up before