Mailbag: Do I need still need older versions of the .NET Framework on my system after installing .NET Framework 3.5 SP1?
Question:
I recently installed the .NET Framework 3.5 SP1 on my system. Afterwards, I looked in Add/Remove Programs, and it shows that I have all of the following versions of the .NET Framework installed on my system:
- Microsoft .NET Framework 1.0
- Microsoft .NET Framework 1.1
- Microsoft .NET Framework 2.0 SP2
- Microsoft .NET Framework 3.0 SP2
- Microsoft .NET Framework 3.5 SP1
Do I need any of these older versions of the .NET Framework now that I’ve installed the .NET Framework 3.5 SP1, or can I safely uninstall them?
Answer:
When you install the .NET Framework 3.5 SP1, it will also install the .NET Framework 2.0 SP2 and the .NET Framework 3.0 SP2 behind the scenes. You cannot use the .NET Framework 3.5 SP1 unless you also have the .NET Framework 2.0 SP2 and 3.0 SP2 installed. Therefore, you will not be allowed to uninstall the .NET Framework 2.0 SP2 or 3.0 SP2 if you have the .NET Framework 3.5 SP1 installed. If you try to uninstall those versions of the .NET Framework, their uninstall processes will block and tell you that they are needed by another application on your system.
The .NET Framework 1.0 and .NET Framework 1.1 can be installed side-by-side with the .NET Framework 2.0, 3.0 and 3.5. Most applications that were created for the .NET Framework 1.0 or 1.1 will automatically use the .NET Framework 2.0 instead if it is installed on the system. In most cases, that means you do not need to keep the .NET Framework 1.0 or 1.1 installed on your system if you already have the .NET Framework 2.0 installed.
However, there are some applications that are configured to require a specific version of the .NET Framework, even if later versions of the .NET Framework are installed. If you have any applications like that on your system and try to run them without installing the .NET Framework 1.0 or 1.1, you will get an error message that looks like the following:
---------------------------
MyApplication.exe - .NET Framework Initialization Error
---------------------------
To run this application, you first must install one of the following versions of the .NET Framework:
v1.1.4322
Contact your application publisher for instructions about obtaining the appropriate version of the .NET Framework.
---------------------------
OK
---------------------------
In the above error message, the version number will be v1.0.3705 if you need to install the .NET Framework 1.0, and it will be v1.1.4322 if you need to install the .NET Framework 1.1.
If you end up seeing any error messages like this, you can re-install the .NET Framework 1.0 or 1.1 in order to resolve the errors. If you don't end up seeing any error messages like this, then you don't need to worry about re-installing the .NET Framework 1.0 or 1.1.
Comments
Anonymous
April 20, 2009
The comment has been removedAnonymous
May 02, 2009
De afgelopen periode was nogal een periode van veranderingen. Zo was er de bijna overname van Sun doorAnonymous
May 04, 2009
PingBack from http://www.keyongtech.com/5162625-net-framework-questionAnonymous
July 28, 2011
Many thanks Mr Stebner! All the heartache and frustration of MS is assauged by all the kind folks like you who offer so much great help out of the kindness of your hearts! Peace and Blessings! from Belly-viewAnonymous
August 19, 2011
Thank u for the answer, to the point and informative!Anonymous
September 22, 2011
Do I need the .NET Framework 3.5 SP1 now that I’ve installed the .NET Framework 4? Or can I safely uninstall .NET Framework 3.5 SP1 after I've installed the .NET Framework 4? Thank you.Anonymous
September 25, 2011
Hi Leo - By default, the .NET Framework 4 does not allow all applications built for earlier verisons of the .NET Framework to migrate forward and run on it if the earlier versions are not installed. If you are using any applications that were built with any version of the .NET Framework before version 4, then I would recommend leaving both the .NET Framework 3.5 SP1 and 4 installed.Anonymous
September 28, 2011
Thanks for the info. That's what I suspect too.Anonymous
October 03, 2011
Does the same apply to XNA framework versions?Anonymous
October 03, 2011
Hi Phespy - No, this guidance doesn't apply to the XNA Framework. Each version of the XNA Framework is completely side-by-side and does not know about any other versions. You must make sure that you deploy the exact version of the XNA Framework that your game is built against, even if any other versions of the XNA Framework are already installed on the computer.Anonymous
October 03, 2011
Thank you very much for the help and quick responseAnonymous
November 24, 2011
Thank you for your response, it answered my question on Net Framework.Anonymous
December 05, 2011
The comment has been removedAnonymous
December 05, 2011
Hi Shawnee - Each version of the .NET Framework is designed to install and run side-by-side with older versions, so there won't be a new version that replaces all of the previous ones. That being said, most older .NET applications will run correctly if you have 3.5 installed and you can probably uninstall the .NET Framework 1.0 and 1.1 from your computer if you are low on disk space.Anonymous
December 05, 2011
Ugh... hope they modify that someday... thanks for the advice... I'll give it a try. Merry Xmas :) S.Anonymous
July 19, 2012
This is very informative THANKS for such clear and helpful answers! My only problem now is the Windows Security Update for 3.5 won't install on my Windows 7. I've already got .Net 4. Should I be worried? I've tried pretty much everything to sort it out but I'm not getting anywhere.Anonymous
September 14, 2012
Thank you so much,your knowledge is awesome and extremely helpful. I just wish microsoft was.lol,Thanks again ;)Anonymous
November 24, 2012
Gee, would I like to kick Bill Gates in the pants. This miserable garbage system he is growing is costing us a fortune. If IBM had just taken up 'Oasis'(theos) when offered we would have super speed now without the $billions spent on massive equipment to overcome Gates.Anonymous
December 11, 2012
so what i don't understand is: if let's say i don't have any .net framework on my pc if i install version 4 or 3.5 they won't work because i don't have the previous versions?... i really doubt that.Anonymous
December 11, 2012
Hi Calin - The .NET Framework 4.5 and 4 don't require any other versions of the .NET Framework in order to run correctly. The .NET Framework 3.5 is essentially just an add-on though, and it requires both the .NET Framework 2.0 and 3.0 in order to run correctly. The installer for the .NET Framework 3.5 will install all 3 of those versions automatically though, so you don't need to worry about forgetting to install 2.0 or 3.0 in this scenario.Anonymous
December 14, 2012
Thank you for your help. It was clear and saved me a lot of time.Anonymous
January 17, 2013
Great Teachers! From humble student.Anonymous
April 09, 2013
Nice primer. Thank you.Anonymous
July 16, 2013
I've said it before-- I'll say it again. YOU ARE THE BEST!! Even if half the time I fail to fully understand your cogent, concise instructions. I remember one time I even emailed you and you wrote back. You are a true blessing for so many not so informed...Anonymous
July 17, 2013
It finally worked. Running VISTAx32. Uninstalled the .NET Framework 1 and followed netframe repair tool and ended up following in order the numerous updates... All in all, up to 22 of 'em. Through .Netframe 4 et seq. Not sure I need them all, but OS's running great!!Anonymous
July 17, 2013
The comment has been removedAnonymous
July 24, 2013
so after reading all above are you saying that network 4.5 or 4 needs to be installed and the others dont have to be installed since 4.5 doesnt need them to perform correctly. because i have 1.1 ,2.0,3.0,4 client profile ,and 4 extended do i need all of that installedAnonymous
July 25, 2013
Hi Neece - You're correct. The .NET Framework 4.5 doesn't require any other versions of the .NET Framework in order to work correctly. Not all applications will work correctly if you only have the .NET Framework 4.5 installed though, so it still might be necessary to install some of the other versions of the .NET Framework on your computer depending on what applications you use. I wrote an updated version of this blog post that includes information about the .NET Framework 4, and it might help for you to take a quick look at that post too. You can find it at blogs.msdn.com/.../10219046.aspx. One other note too - the .NET Framework 4.5 is a full replacement for the .NET Framework 4, so it isn't possible to install both the .NET Framework 4.5 and 4 on the same computer.Anonymous
November 15, 2013
Thank you very much for the lessons........just one more quickly, how do I uninstall NET 3.0 on my pc ???Anonymous
November 18, 2013
Hi Kinzo - The answer to that question depends on what version of Windows you have on your computer and what other versions of the .NET Framework you have on your computer. If you have the .NET Framework 3.5 installed, it requires the .NET Framework 3.0, so you won't be allowed to uninstall 3.0 out from under 3.5. Some versions of Windows come with the .NET Framework 3.0 (Windows Vista) or 3.5 (Windows 7, Windows 8, Windows 8.1). In those versions of Windows, you can enable/disable the .NET Framework 3.0 and 3.5 by going to the Windows Features control panel (optionalfeatures.exe) and unchecking the .NET Framework 3.0 or 3.5 item listed in there.Anonymous
January 11, 2014
I have Windows XP Professional SP3 and I was looking at my list of programs one day quite awhile back and wondered what .NET Framework was, I googled it at that time and I read it was something used by developers. I was able to remove some of the updates I had in my computer. However, that seemed to start some problems and I then wondered why the computer let me delete the updates if they were needed. I hired a technician and he removed them all and downloaded only .NET Framework 1.1 into my computer but that's it. Don't I need more updates? I wonder how their absence is affecting my computer as I have noticed it is slower, etc. I have no knowledge of how .NET Framework affects computers and their efficient operation...Thank youAnonymous
January 12, 2014
Hi Kathy - You don't necessarily need a version of the .NET Framework until you try to use an application that requires it. Installing or not installing it won't affect the speed of your computer. You can see more details about what the .NET Framework is by looking at this page on Wikipedia - en.wikipedia.org/.../.NET_Framework.Anonymous
January 17, 2014
Thank you Aaron. I was lead to believe that because I didn't have all the updates I was not getting all the necessary Windows updates to my computer. Thanks for the clarificationAnonymous
January 23, 2014
My dilemma is that I intend to go on using my W.XP computers for years to come, as I still use DOS, W.95, W.98SE, W.7... Should I install all the available updates, including all the .NETs to cover my back when MS delte the update service?Anonymous
January 23, 2014
Hi Nick - Yes, I'd recommend installing all available updates on your Windows XP computers and also to enable Windows Update so you can keep up to date in case any further updates are released in the future.Anonymous
January 24, 2014
Thanks for the advice. I've now installed the lot, except for the smart card and search add ons and media player 11. Might still add the latter... Then will clone my disk!Anonymous
February 12, 2014
The comment has been removedAnonymous
February 12, 2014
Hi ChrisMikeC - There is a table in the MSDN topic at msdn.microsoft.com/.../ms994381.aspx that explains what the behavior will be for a .NET Framework 1.1 application if the .NET Framework 1.1 and/or the .NET Framework 2.0 are installed on the computer. To summarize that table for your scenario, if a .NET Framework 1.1 app is run on a computer that has the .NET Framework 2.0 installed but does not have the .NET Framework 1.1 installed, it will use the .NET Framework 2.0 at runtime unless the app includes a configuration file that specifically forbids it from doing that. If you need it, there are examples of configuration files for this type of scenario at msdn.microsoft.com/.../jj152935(v=vs.110).aspx.Anonymous
April 13, 2014
Aaron, I was interested in Nick's comment about still using his computers with XP for years to come, as well as the DOS, Windows 95, etc.? The fact he's been using computers with DOS and Windows 95 shows that it can be done without the Windows updates? I love my computer with XP and it runs perfectly. I hate buy a new laptop just because MS no longer supports XP. I am in a dilemma about it. I have MS Security Essentials and if I run a scan every night to catch threats, viruses, etc. will I be ok? It's just that my computer won't look updated? That's ok by me, I just don't want to have security issuesAnonymous
April 14, 2014
Hi Kathy - I'd encourage you to read the post at windows.microsoft.com/.../end-support-help for more details about your scenario. To summarize it, you will only continue to receive antimalware signature updates for Microsoft Security Essentials on Windows XP for a limited time, and Microsoft is no longer providing security updates for Windows XP. As a result, you won't be able to keep your Windows XP computer completely secure now that support has ended for it. I'd encourage you to start looking at updating to Windows 8.1 if possible.Anonymous
April 15, 2014
The comment has been removedAnonymous
April 16, 2014
The comment has been removedAnonymous
April 17, 2014
im trying to install the .net 3.5 but once the setup is nearly finished the "use the turn windows feature on or off appear, but its already turned on, (already have the Microsoft .NET Framework4 Client profile installed) nedd help on thisAnonymous
April 18, 2014
Hi Jet - Can you please use the tool described at blogs.msdn.com/.../6458047.aspx to collect all of your setup log files, upload the file named %temp%vslogs.cab that this tool will create to a file server (such as http://onedrive.live.com), and then reply back here and provide a link that I can use to download your log files and take a closer look?